@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Hypx

@Hypx@kbin.social

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

BEVs are a dead end. It's an idea older than internal combustion and is already obsolete. The world needs to shift focus to concepts like e-fuels or hydrogen cars.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

It's fuel made using electricity as the energy source.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You avoid the giant, expensive battery though. People are obsessed with efficiency in a self-defeating way.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Better ban solar panels cause they're only 15-20% efficient. /s

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

E-fuels are made from solar power. It is not anywhere near 0%. Also, clearly efficiency is not "the only metric that matters."

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

BEVs are fundamentally more expensive than conventional cars. That is the real problem here. Blaming the dealers won't change that.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You're a fucking climate change denier. Stop bullshitting the rest of us.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Hydrogen is pretty much the only one that really works. It allows you to store energy for months on end, or ship/pipe it around for thousands of miles.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Batteries are not a sustainable solution. For vehicles the size of SUVs, they are a disaster. In reality, the vast majority of transportation will be powered by some kind of chemical fuel. If you must have electrified vehicles, then you should look at trams, trolleybuses, light rail, etc.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Except fast charging quickly degrades the battery. For people without home charging access, this is the key issue. In reality, BEVs won't catch on. Between the cost, weight, and other problems of the battery, it is a doomed idea and a repeat of the early 20th century. The future of transportation will involve a chemical fuel, whether it's ICE or fuel cell powered or whatever. It has to mirror the functionality of existing cars completely, or it won't work.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Solid state batteries don't exist yet. It's the classic "magic batteries from the future will solve everything" argument. Meanwhile, a sensible path to zero emissions exist now, provide you accept that we should making zero emissions chemical fuels. At some point, refusal to accept this option is its own form of climate change denial.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

We already have that ability. In particular, we can now make hydrogen from electrolysis at vast scale. Derivative fuels, such as ammonia, are also doable.

Your problem is that you are being brainwashed by the battery companies. You think magical batteries exist when they do not, but are stuck in the early 2000s when it comes to competing technologies.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

The only people saying this are battery investors. They merely want to replace our dependency on fossil fuels with a dependency on their batteries. That is the real scam.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You're just spreading propaganda against hydrogen. It is fundamental to a zero emissions society. It is even necessary to get the grid to zero emissions. Nearly all rhetoric against hydrogen is just some kind of corporate propaganda, if not from the battery industry then it is from the petroleum industry.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Wrong. you are totally stuck with the metal requirements needed for those batteries. It is just another dependency. Meanwhile, the alternative such as hydrogen has no such dependencies.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

There is almost zero interest from the fossil fuel industry for hydrogen. It is pursued as enthusiastically as they pursue wind and solar. There is no reason they will strongly pursue anything that could replace fossil fuels. And if they did, then all the better, since it is in fact, green energy.

What you're doing is just gish gallop. It has no bearing to reality. You are arguing a conspiracy theory where if the fossil fuel industry pursues a green energy technology, it automatically means it is a scam. A claim with so many illogical leaps of faiths that it is incoherent. Even wind and solar would be scams in that worldview, since fossil fuel companies spend something on those technologies.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You can also extract hydrogen from water. Except now it's not an insanely impractical idea. Sodium batteries haven't been invented yet, and will have a much lower energy density.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

The link is dead.

You have an inverted view of reality. Hydrogen fuel cells are a now technology. Your idea don’t exist outside of science projects and underwhelming early demonstration versions.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

This is just Gish gallop. Please shut up. If you use your style of rhetoric, wind, solar and even battery manufacturing are just a scam by the oil companies. This is pure gibberish. Volume of bullshit doesn’t make for a coherent argument.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Now it is working.

But it doesn't matter. Those are hoax products. None of them exist in the real world. You can't actually buy them, or they are secretly some other type of battery. No one has actually seen a working sodium-ion battery in public.

Fuel cells are already in mass production. Again, you are simply living in the early 2000s on this subject. You are wildly outdated on your knowledge.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

It literally takes one company to serious invest in green hydrogen as an environmentally friendly solution to debunk your entire conspiracy theory. Which obvious has been proven long ago.

Again, you're using Gish gallop. It's utter bullshit. It's not even worth anyone's time to try an debunk. The better move is to flag you as a corporate stooge and a dishonest liar and ignore you from the rest of the conversation.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

The very article is about powering a bus with hydrogen. It is both mass transit and green.

The problem is that you are so deep in your brainwashing that it is impossible to hold a conversation with you. You are pretty much a climate change denier. If you haven't realized that yet, then you're too stupid to realize that you're one of them.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Again, electric buses already exist. They're called trolleybuses. It's pretty obvious that battery powered buses are madness and are a way of reinventing the wheel. And raging against hydrogen powered buses is just part of the BEV propaganda mill. As if e-buses cannot exist without giant batteries.

Again, you're the one spreading a conspiracy theory. You need to prove your case, not me. Which is pretty much impossible because it is so obviously bullshit.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Again, this is Gish gallop. You cannot bullshit your way out of this. Again, you're being the brainwashed climate change denier who thinks expanding mass transit is somehow a conspiracy of the oil companies. No one has time nor patience to tell you down.

Ultimately, you're just a piece of brainwashed scum. Seriously, fuck you.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Your argument is that buses powered by green energy is a conspiracy by the oil companies. That's ludicrous.

No one is going to debate such an insane nutcase. Again, fuck you and fuck off. You're just a climate change denier.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Funny, because you can replace "fuel cells" with "solar cells" and you would've nearly mirrored the anti-solar power rhetoric of a decade ago.

What you're doing is blatant Ludditism. It is closer to being a climate change denier tactic than anything honest.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You're too brainwashed to know what you're talking about. Very likely you're just regurgitating what the battery industry wants you to think.

Hydrogen is obvious a zero emissions fuel. It is as self-evident as wind or solar. What you doing is the exact same thing as what climate change deniers did. Somehow argue that new green technology is secretly a scam, or it is impossible, or a trick by the fossil fuel industry. In reality, saying such obvious lies makes you the climate change denier.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Same story with solar cells, again. Everything starts at zero, and nothing is magically perfect from day one. You are doing exactly what climate change deniers said about all new green technologies when they first came out.

Meanwhile, battery cars are older than internal combustion cars. You think you have a point here, but you don't. You are cheering on totally obsolete technology as if it is anything new.

In reality, you are just being brainwashed by corporate propaganda. All you're digging your hole even deeper, and even more indistinguishable from blatant climate change denier.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

And we are in the second century of battery powered cars. Even solar cells are technical over 100 years old.

The difference is that we already tried battery powered cars, and replace them with internal combustion cars. It is fundamentally an obsolete idea. Guys like you want us to stop advancing and stop stick with obsolete technology.

You're frankly too deep in your delusion to be worth "disproving." As long as you oppose green energy, you are a climate change denier. And as a long as you reject new ideas, you are a Luddite. There is no need to go into detail over how nonsensical your position actually is.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Wrong. You're the one opposed to green energy at every turn. You're just so brainwashed you can't even understand your own position.

Everything is as green as its energy source. Electricity can also be made from natural gas. Is electricity now an elaborate conspiracy by the oil companies? Seriously, it's multiple levels of delusional thinking and cognitive dissonance.

No one has every built commercial hydrogen cars until a few years ago. It is fundamentally a never-before-seen technology. If you reject the climate change denier tag, then you get the Luddite tag.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You mean in a series of highly experimental vehicles and with no refueling infrastructure, then sure. But in reality, no has seriously tried hydrogen cars until recently. All the support for BEVs is just the result of government subsidies. It is entirely a fake market, and will die off as soon as the subsidies end.

Wind and solar were just rounding errors on the grid until recently. You could've easily made the same argument for BEVs until recently. Not that it matters, because the insanely resource dependent and extremely expensive batteries doom them to inevitable obsolescence for a second time. Car companies that won't get on board with hydrogen will just die off.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You mean 1-2 kWh of batteries? Not the same thing. The platinum claim is outdated. It is no more than a catalytic convertor in newer designs.

Hydrogen have not received any real subsidies, at least not yet anyways. The main limiting factor has been the refueling system, which has been mostly ignored until recently. All of this is changing though. The next big deal in green energy is the hydrogen infrastructure.

Again, stop repeating climate change denier rhetoric. Hydrogen is made from water. When used, it turns back into water. It literally self-recycles with zero effort. Batteries are infinitely inferior on this criteria.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Again, stop with your climate change denier rhetoric. Hydrogen can be made from water. Just like electricity can be made from green sources. Saying that it must be made from fossil fuels is a conspiracy theory and just proves that you are climate change denier.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Again, you're repeating more climate change denier rhetoric. Again, you can make hydrogen from water. It is as green as its energy source. This is the exact same argument as the one made for BEVs. If you cannot wrapped your head around that, then you are too brainwashed by BEV propaganda to even see straight.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Again, you are repeating a climate change denier's argument. No one cared that solar cells are inefficient. But somehow now, it suddenly matters.

Sorry, the problem is that you are utterly delusional and brainwashed by BEV propaganda. It's impossible for you to even see straight.

There is nothing but for you to stop being a climate change denier. That is all.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Because BEVs aren't the future. This is just a way to give certain companies money and nothing more.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

If not hydrogen cars, it will be something like e-fuels. The point is that the replacement for existing vehicles must be able to fully match the abilities of them, or it won't happen.

Maryland's handgun licensing law has been struck down by a federal appeals court (apnews.com)

A federal appeals court on Tuesday struck down Maryland’s handgun licensing law, finding that its requirements, which include submitting fingerprints for a background check and taking a four-hour firearms safety course, are unconstitutionally restrictive....

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

People need to realize that the 2A is simply obsolete. It's irrelevant talking about original intention when that is totally irrelevant to the modern world. It's an inevitability that the 2A goes away. The only question is how it removed.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

BEVs aren't the future. They are heavily dependent on mined metals and are basically unsustainable. Society has no choice but to move on beyond them.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Which is why BEVs aren't the future.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

You basically just reinvented the bus/taxi...

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

The stock market is historically overvalued right now. The long-term direction is downwards, not upwards.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

It is well above historical valuations. Ultimately, the problem is that you simply won't get much of an ROI if you keep on investing on stocks at these valuations. So the natural trend is for people to move away from stocks,

Hypx , (edited )
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

There's an old adage in programming that you should almost never rewrite everything: https://www.onstartups.com/tabid/3339/bid/2596/Why-You-Should-Almost-Never-Rewrite-Your-Software.aspx

Going from their existing RED engine to Unreal is basically the same idea. Almost nothing from the original Cyberpunk game is going to be easily translated to the new platform. I think CDPR just set their development timeline back by at least 3 years.

Hypx ,
@Hypx@kbin.social avatar

Given how massive their game is, I'm doubtful. So much of what they did in the first game will have to be rebuilt. Compared to just reusing most of the original assets and code, this sounds like a lot more work.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • brutaldeathmetal
  • Rutgers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • Milwaukee
  • TheGameClub
  • Mediums
  • mead
  • WatchParties
  • xyz
  • ai_art
  • ZenlessZoneZero
  • itdept
  • kamenrider
  • pixo
  • RPI
  • Lexington
  • LycorisRecoil
  • NDE
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • abstract_art
  • cragsand
  • PowerRangers
  • learnviet
  • Terraria
  • bjj
  • Kashmir
  • ChainsawMan
  • TomBoy
  • All magazines