simpsonsshitposting

Hegar , in A simple guide
@Hegar@kbin.social avatar

This is so clever and I love it, but for pedantry's sake, he was tangy and brown in s1e3 and yellow by s1e4.

Wikipedia says both that it was an error by a colorist and that a decision was made that gay and black was a bit too much for a sycophantic character.

homesweethomeMrL ,

You forgot to lick the cheese dust off your fingers first.

Hegar ,
@Hegar@kbin.social avatar

I didn't forget I just didn't wanna.

moody ,

Saving it for later, right?

homesweethomeMrL ,

lol the downvotes

Hegar ,
@Hegar@kbin.social avatar

Oh hmm, are downvotes not shared between lemmy and kbin? I don't see any.

drasglaf ,
@drasglaf@sh.itjust.works avatar

I have an account on Kbin and no, you don't usually see downvotes. But I don't see that as a bad thing actually. Your comments in this thread didn't get any downvote, by the way.

JowlesMcGee ,
@JowlesMcGee@kbin.social avatar

To be more specific, kbin doesn't federate downvotes, or at least doesn't import downvotes from outside an instance. Not sure if it sends any downvotes generated here back out, but any downvotes you see here are from other kbin.social users

drasglaf ,
@drasglaf@sh.itjust.works avatar

Good to know, thank you.

Hegar ,
@Hegar@kbin.social avatar

you don’t usually see downvotes ... didn’t get any downvote

A bummer on both accounts. Thanks for the info!

jol ,

Yeah it's unexpe Ted until you learn about it. Lemmy doesn't share votes between instances.

homesweethomeMrL ,

Maybe a bunch of irate tankie bots? Heck I dunno. It's obviously just a silly riff on Comic Book Guy and not even spicy at that. But now (-77) there's apparently 77 people who "disagree" with it?

Again, and not out of insecurity (thanks null) but just out of amusement that so many would care - lol. They're probalby looking for VRYSRSSimpsonsshitposting.

samus12345 ,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

It's not obvious that it's a riff on Comic Book Guy and just comes off as rude. Was there ever a scene where he had cheese dust on his fingers?

homesweethomeMrL ,

Wow, seriously? He’s - always eating junk food and correcting people? That’s not - you’re saying 77 denizens of SIMPSONSshitposting are unaware of these characteristics of Comic Book Guy?

Goddamn. Ok.

Here.
https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0086da3b-1968-483e-9ada-f2acd3f1e116.gif

samus12345 ,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

No, I'm sure they're all aware, but mentioning cheese dust on fingers alone isn't a characteristic that automatically brings him to mind. If that is cheese dust in the gif, I'm not familiar with a kind that's eaten out of a pan. Something like "Better hurry that pedantry up, your breakfast burrito is congealing rapidly" might work.

Regardless, the person your comment was directed at didn't seem to take it the wrong way, so no harm, no foul.

homesweethomeMrL ,

Okay so: I’m a Simpsons character and I’m going to lick cheese dust off my fingers and the correct someone - Who Am I?

Anyone? Beuller? No? Okay. I mean, I thought it was obvious. (Nacho cheese in the gif, or a Squishee, or a Krustyburger if that’s relevant but none were as funny as cheeto dust)

And yeah the OP was supposed to enjoy it, which I also thought they did, which is another reason it’s so bizarre to have almost 85 downvotes for it now. Worst. Comment thread. Ever.

(Uh, it’s not really the worst comment thread ever, that’s, yknow, also a Comic Book Guy, uh, thing. Just - in case anyone’s not - eh, whatever)

samus12345 ,
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar

I thought it was obvious.

It wasn't, so I'm pretty sure perceived rudeness is the reason for the downvotes. No matter, there's no karma here.

homesweethomeMrL ,

I dunno, I disagree. Like, a couple of people - ok that's statistically inevitable, but almost 100? That's . . . too many.

homesweethomeMrL ,

I dunno, it just shows "-45" on my cheese dust joke.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Hegar ,
@Hegar@kbin.social avatar

That's a lot of folks presuming bad faith. I've barely seen -5 on my spiciest takes.

null ,
@null@slrpnk.net avatar

lol the insecurity

highsight ,

Boy, I hope somebody got fired for that blunder.

MeDuViNoX , in And the death star was blown up by, let's say, Moe.
homesweethomeMrL , in And the death star was blown up by, let's say, Moe.

Somehow, Mr. Burns returned.

JoShmoe , in My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball. But tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward; upward, not forward; and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!

drops out and then endorses Boris Johnson

itsgroundhogdayagain , in My fellow Americans. As a young boy, I dreamed of being a baseball. But tonight I say, we must move forward, not backward; upward, not forward; and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom!

"Nonpartisan"

"Party Affiliation: Democrat"

Phegan ,

Any elections for city positions can be non partisan, that doesn't mean the individual does not have a political affiliation. It means they are running for a seat that is not a partisan seat and does not have primary elections to determine the party representative for that seat in the general election.

cupcakezealot , in Simpsons did it!
@cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar
Buddahriffic , in Simpsons did it!

When they say the universe "may have" a complex geometry, is this speculation about what's possible or based on some evidence that suggests this is the case instead of the simpler "it's just 3d space plus time with all extending outwards in each direction that we are already aware of"?

Don't get me wrong, I love me some speculation about what other realities would fit in with what we've observed, but actual evidence would be more cool, especially given that I don't even know what such evidence would even look like, other than being able to see ourselves in some far off direction (though even then, I'd wonder how we could be sure it's actually us and not some others that just look just like us and happen to do the same things at the same time).

samus12345 , in Simpsons did it!
@samus12345@lemmy.world avatar
Sam_Bass , in Simpsons did it!

aka torus

RizzRustbolt , in Simpsons did it!

Scientists still currently unsure on if the universe has sprinkles or not.

Kolanaki , in Simpsons did it!
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

I always wondered if Steven Hawking was ever actually a guest on The Simpsons or any other cartoon he appears in. Surely he had the easiest voice to fake back before modern robo voices and AI.

TexasDrunk ,

Yes, for exactly 2 series!

He was a Futurama fan and recorded his voice three times for the show. Gygax and Al Gore also did their own voices.

He also did voice work on The Simpsons. In both they sent him the lines and he recorded them at home.

He also did a few live action shows and appeared in Star Trek TNG, The Big Bang Theory, narrated Into the Universe with Stephen Hawking, and hosted Masters of Science Fiction (off screen). He also did some talk shows and some factual stuff, but that's less interesting in this context.

The other places where you see him were people just using a voice synth.

Timecircleline ,

I like science but I love cartoons.

TexasDrunk ,

I love both, but what I really love is people doing fun things out of the context in which I know them. That includes both people like Stephen Hawking doing cartoons and people like one of my bartenders on the same Singles Ghost Tour I went on a few years ago (I don't believe but the "history" is fun).

Timecircleline ,
TexasDrunk ,

Holy shit, I completely forgot about that! Sorry, memory isn't what it used to be.

Timecircleline ,

All good, we both need to rewatch it now ;)

TexasDrunk ,

Starting Space Pilot 3000 now.

VirtualOdour ,

He was a guest at epstines Island too, just because he's disabled doesn't mean he lives in a box.

EmoDuck ,

You know, houses are a kind of box

SamWoof03 ,

Every box is a house but not every house is a box

Kolanaki ,
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

And they're made of ticky tacky and all look the same.

mojo_raisin , in Simpsons did it!

mmmm universe

PhlubbaDubba , in Simpsons did it!

For those curious, the donut shaped universe shown isn't what the theoretical universe model actually looks like,

What it represents is an "asteroids like" geometry of a two dimensional universe where exiting one "side" brings you to a corresponding point on the other.

The proposed donut geometry of the universe is what's called a 3-roid or 3-tauroid, which is basically the same idea as the asteroids like 2D universe but for a prism instead of a rectangle. Meaning that our ability to return to the starting point is based on the fact that we are moving along a 3-D "surface" of a 4th dimensional object, the way the Asteroids ship loops back to the start by moving across the 2-dimensional surface of a 3-D geometry.

Part of me wonders if this means that the actual boundaries of the universe are at 0+ and 0- along the W/A axis in 4-D space, and if that means that every character who has some power related to moving in 4-D space would actually just fall out of space and time if they ever tried using their abilities for real.

cm0002 ,

What.

lobut ,

I asked ChatGPT to explain it to me and it came up with this:

This description is discussing a theoretical concept where the universe is shaped like a donut, known as a "3-roid" or "3-tauroid". In this model, moving through the universe is akin to navigating a 3D surface of a 4D object, similar to how a spaceship in a 2D video game wraps around when reaching the edge of the screen. The suggestion of characters with 4D movement abilities falling out of space and time is a speculative idea based on this theoretical framework.

SkyezOpen ,

I told chatgpt to go fuck itself and it came up with this:

This content may violate our usage policies.

anarchist ,
@anarchist@lemmy.ml avatar

I asked my arse and it said:

ooooooooooooooouuuuuuh

ArmoredThirteen ,

This but the donut is 4d so that 3d things can move around on it (I think...)

ramirezmike ,

kinda makes you wonder if this was a practice universe or something

variants ,

So a donut just like in the picture? Homer was rights the earth isn't flat but donut shaped

deo ,

to me at least, the picture made it look like the galaxies and stuff were inside the "bread" of the donut, as opposed to being "frosting" on the surface.

Sanctus ,
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

If its anything like moving on the z axis of a 2D game you just will seem to pop out of existence or you'll draw over other people and objects.

edgemaster72 ,
@edgemaster72@lemmy.world avatar

I think they covered what happens when you get to one side of the universe and keep going in a different episode

https://ew.com/thmb/3xlFv2SFjjK_phnqYN5VnGmKVsM=/1500x0/filters:no_upscale():max_bytes(150000):strip_icc()/simpsons-2-2000-a6c4261fbb6d4e5094f717b494b546eb.jpg

Digestive_Biscuit ,
@Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk avatar

"it's somewhere I haven't been before"
"The shower"

pwalshj ,

"It's like he just disappeared in to fat air."

Danitos ,

Fun fact: 1782¹² + 1841¹² = 1922¹² is an incorrect equation, per Fermat's last theorem.

They put that equation there because some of the writers of the episode have a mathematical background, and they knew it was wrong, but the error is so relatively small that if someone writes that in a normal calculator they'll get the equality. So basically an easter egg for someone that knows about Fermat's last theorem.

TheObviousSolution ,

I forgot about this paper, but I am toying with a spacetime hypothesis where it and your notes are on point. Well, except for the end.

FartsWithAnAccent , in Simpsons did it!
FartsWithAnAccent avatar

Son of a bitch...

skvlp , in Simpsons did it!
@skvlp@lemm.ee avatar

Since it’s useless to post links like this without an AI summary:

Physicists report the possibility of the universe having a complex, doughnut-like geometry, challenging the belief in its trivial topology.

Topology

The universe may have nontrivial topology, similar to a doughnut, allowing for travel across the cosmos and ending up back where you started.

Research

Scientists have searched for signs of complex topology in the cosmic microwave background, but have not found evidence yet.

New Study

A new study evaluated 17 possible nontrivial topologies for the cosmos, finding that most of these topologies have not been ruled out.

Future Analysis

Future analyses of the cosmic microwave background could reveal hints of complex topologies, and machine learning techniques may be required for computational challenges.

Motivation

There is motivation to look for nontrivial topology as some features of the cosmic microwave background hint at asymmetry, which could be explained by nontrivial topology.

Further Research

Scientists plan to hunt for signs of nontrivial topology in upcoming data from surveys of the distribution of galaxies in the cosmos.

sus ,

this summary doesn't have some information that is pretty critical if you want to compare it to the meme

Searches for that simple 3-torus have come up empty. But scientists haven’t yet searched for some 3-torus variations. For example, the sides of the cube might be twisted relative to one another. In such a universe, exiting the top of the cube would bring you back to the bottom, but rotated by, for example, 180 degrees.

So to ruin thine dreams, a summary:

Season 10 was in 1998

A "donut-shaped" universe (3-torus) was proposed in 1984 (the paper also points out it's the simplest finite 3d topology, so it's probably been considered even earlier)

This article talks about more complicated "donut shapes" that haven't been ruled out before

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • simpsonsshitposting@sh.itjust.works
  • kamenrider
  • Rutgers
  • jeremy
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • loren
  • steinbach
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • WatchParties
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • Mordhau
  • itdept
  • AgeRegression
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • electropalaeography
  • space_engine
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • Teensy
  • MidnightClan
  • khanate
  • neondivide
  • supersentai
  • fandic
  • All magazines