If you think that bicycle roads require the same maintenance ad highways for 35 tons trucks, then good for you.
Those 35 ton trucks are needed to bring me a bicycle. The food I buy from the grocer does not get there without roads.
Who is going to pressure any Belgian government to release free software? Is that a constitutional right?
Whether the right exists or not is an interesting question. The GDPR enshrines a number of transparency rights on how our personal data is processed. It makes no direct overt mention of open source code but I have yet to investigate whether code disclosure can be derived from GDPR transparency clauses. Certainly if there is no right, this thread is the bug report illustrating why transparency rights are needed. It’d be a bit premature to expect the right to be in a national constitution, but in 2024 it’s surprising how little headway has been made outside of Italy.
Didn't you read what I said in that comment? Mullvad browser is free, for everyone, no need to use Mullvad VPN.
It is interesting that Mullvad’s browser is gratis and functions without the tunnel. For that reason, I will be looking into it and I appreciate your tip. But I must say you’ve lost track of why you brought that up: the gov website blocks the IPs of Tor exit nodes. Using a different browser makes no difference in that regard because the blockade impacts before the webserver even knows what browser is in play. This is why you suggested a VPN.
A VPN would solve the problem well enough, and the Mullvad browser would help to increase the level of anonymity (though not to the extent of Tor), but I did not intend to ask for support with this thread. This thread calls out injustices in how an app is deployed. I personally can circumvent various problems (apart from the closed-source problem), but the real fix needs to be with the app deployment so everyone can benefit.
I can't afford a car, I can't use the roads, still I pay for it with my taxes
I can't afford a bike/I'm disabled and can't use a bike, still I pay for those with my taxes
You still need to eat. You still need public services. Even if you live off grid, you still benefit from police, fire, ambulance in particular. Those all depend on the road infrastructure.
I can't have children, still I pay for public education
You had a legally entitled opportunity to attend school. Even if you chose not to take it, you still benefit from others using that opportunity, such as the doc who operates on you.
I can't afford a smartphone, even based on free software, I can't use this app still I pay for it with my taxes
You could make the same argument for having a phone at all. The same logic leads you to tear down the 112 number. OTOH, if you have no phone and you need urgent help, you will shout for it and someone will contact emergency services for you using whatever tool they have. More tools enable more people to respond quickly. A tap on a button in the app will send location info faster than a voice conversation. So I don’t have a problem with the existence of the app. I only have a problem with the exclusive way it was deployed to select groups using artificial and unnecessary requirements.
They do not give up their human rights to have equal access to public healthcare resources
Remembering a 3 digit number is now a public healthcare resources
I just added emphasis where needed. Equal access means a mechanism to request healthcare should not be restricted to Google and Apple patrons as Belgium signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which guarantees access to public healthcare in one article and equal access to public services in another article.
Why? Why should someone accept the consequence of travel more than using a burner email for a Google account?
Because the consequence of travel is inherent in the choice to live far away. Google patronage is not inherent in the choice to have a phone.
As a Flemish tax payer, that's money that doesn't benefit me.
It’s a progressive tax system where the taxation is proportionate to the wealth. It’s really a big can of worms to get into whether the relatively wealthier per capita benefit from such system. That’s not really a good conversation for this thread but I will say that developed countries use a progressive tax regime and advocating for the contrary is to advocate for the sort of state you have with underdeveloped countries, which benefits the fewest numbers of people.