Democrats promote fascists so they can pretend that they're heroes for running against them. Vote for biden, but don't fool yourself into thinking that you're not voting for a fascist, because democrats are absolutely allies of fascists if not outright fascists themselves. They would rather lose an election to a fascist than let a leftist win, 2016 is a prime example of this. As the saying goes, scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.
An actual genocide is happening right now. If biden doesn't feel pressured to stop the genocide at the risk of losing votes in an election year, what makes you think he'll stop it when he's not at any risk of losing the election?
Democrats preserve the status quo while republicans push things further to the right. Since our system guarantees that both parties will win at different times, the trajectory is always to the right. I'm voting for democrats down the entire ballot like I do every single election, but it will ultimately not make a meaningful difference. Democrats are using minorities as a shield for their own failings and inaction. If you don't vote for democrats then they claim it's your fault for whatever situation minorities find themselves in, but democrats do the bare minimum they can for minorities when they do get voted in. You're providing a prime example when you use minorities in the US as an excuse to change the subject from genocide in Palestine.
"Identity politics" is a loaded term, but democrats will absolutely play different disadvantaged groups against one another to stop progress. They did it in 2016 when Bernie was talking about the need to help poor people and democrats came out with "but what about poor black people?!" even though democrats don't do shit for poor black people either and as if poor black people aren't included in the group of poor people.
We send billions to israel every year and have only greatly ramped up the support as israel has ramped up the genocide. If the US simply stopped that support, it would go a long way. Following your logic, people get murdered all the time, so we shouldn't do anything about murder, even if we're the ones directly enabling the murderers.
Israel is the west's vehicle for imperialism in the middle east. It was created by the British through imperialist action and the US has been one of the biggest supporters since. So yes, the US has a huge say in what Israel can do because Israel owes its entire existence to the US and the west at large. If Israel feels so mighty and independent, then they're free to return the hundreds of billions in aid that we've given them and to stop receiving the billions we send them every single year and to not have us fight wars for them.
The odds aren't slim for biden stopping this, it's simply zero. Democrats rely on republicans being worse so that they have an excuse to do nothing. If you have two parties, one that preserves the status quo and the other that makes things worse, then things are only going to get worse because republicans are eventually going to win in our intentionally broken system.
The US is directly sending billions in support to israel. In fact, many of our allies in Europe are doing so much more for the Palestinians than the US. You'd have a point if the US weren't the #1 direct supporter of israel. Do you think the US is sending billions of dollars directly to Russia?
The squeaky wheel gets the grease, as the saying goes. My only hope as far as voting goes is that democrats get a majority so large that they can't just conveniently flip two senators to continue to do nothing. I feel like democrats purposefully eek out the smallest victories they can so they can pretend to be powerless. It's either that or they're ridiculously incompetent, neither inspire confidence. They're just too good at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Regardless, their excuses and lack of results will be even more flagrant if they're given a huge majority.
Nearly three in five Americans wrongly believe the US is in an economic recession, and the majority blame the Biden administration, according to a Harris poll conducted exclusively for the Guardian. The survey found persistent pessimism about the economy as election day draws closer....
The majority of Americans know their situation sucks, they're just not able to express it in numbers, probably because they're busy trying to live their lives. These articles do nothing but smugly highlight that the numbers are tracking the wrong things. Unemployment being low doesn't mean much if a huge chunk of employment is shitty gig work. The stock market being up doesn't anything if over 90% of the stock market is owned by 10% of people. GDP doesn't mean shit and a prime example of that is Canada having nearly 40% of their GDP being made up by overpriced housing, in that case it's just people selling housing at each other and jacking up prices each time while renting it out at exorbitant rates. Not really much being produced there, certainly nothing that improves people's lives (except speculators).
Wage increases on the bottom are somewhat higher on a percentage basis, so if you made $10/hr one year and then $11/hr the next, that's a whopping 10% increase, but given how prices have increased that's really not great. These sorts of gains would have to be sustained over multiple years (like how inflation has sustained over multiple years) to make a good difference.
That's not the reason why they're doing this, just like how eliminating the super size option wasn't to have people eat less junk food. It's not effective in achieving that. This is just to squeeze more profits out of people, on an item that costs them pennies.
Are we forgetting that biden is currently the president and loves genocide so much that he refuses to stop supporting it, even though it's costing him votes? If the best you can offer is "not the other guy" then all you're telling us is that things will get worse no matter what.
You're being intentionally obtuse. We were talking about biden but you changed the subject to yourself because you somehow think feigning stupidity is a great argument tactic.
Also, you're assuming my race, and incorrectly at that. Regardless, why don't you try listening to the many Arab Americans on this issue or are they too white for you? In reality, you're just bringing up minorities as a shield for your support for genocide. Honestly it's disgusting.
They understand perfectly and that's why they're making it on the ballot. So what's it going to be: continue supporting genocide and lose votes or stop supporting genocide and gain votes? Seems like an obvious choice, but maybe you're too smart and understand too much over the masses you look down upon.
Seems like compromise is "the political party does whatever they want and you guarantee your undying loyalty to them with your vote". You speak of youth and naivety, but only an idiot would accept such a "deal". If our votes have power then we should wield it.
Yes, and what will happen if Biden loses. Genocide. Which you don’t give a fuck about.
What is happening right now? That's right, genocide, which you don't care about because you refuse to accept the possibility of ending it. So not only are you jumping around subjects, you're projecting.
I have. This may surprise you, but Arab Americans are not a monolith marching lockstep with your plan to see as many American minorities killed as possible.
You'll find the proportion of Arab Americans supporting genocide rather low. In fact, that would be the case with all races, but you're the one who brought up race in the first place, treating minorities as a monolith to suit your needs. There you go projecting again.
How dare I bring up my own life as a shield to defend the awful crime of [checks notes] seeing as few people murdered as possible.
If I were truly enlightened, I would be calling for as many minorities to be murdered as possible, and for fascists to be put in power. Apparently, that’s what True Leftism™ consists of, according to the geniuses on here.
You know what would result in the fewest people murdered as possible? Not supporting genocide. Ah, but the truly enlightened liberal must enjoy genocide every once in a while, as a treat.
It seems the idea of stopping genocide is too much for your big liberal brain to handle. Instead we have to guarantee votes to someone who full-throatedly supports genocide, denies it's happening, and is deep throating the far-right netanyahu. Of course, liberals helping fascists is actual liberal praxis.
If he doesn't then why did he get so mad when the ICC called for his arrest? Why does he supply him with billions in weapons to carry out his campaign of genocide? Why does he deny genocide in defense of him?
I don't think voting in general is undying loyalty, I think guaranteeing your vote to a party no matter what they do is undying loyalty. That's what they demand and expect because the other guy is worse, but if that's the strategy then they have no need to ever actually improve things because the other guy will always be worse.
If the threat of withholding your vote does not scare the party that is supposedly saving democracy, then they probably don't actually care about democracy, especially when they prioritize genocide over getting those votes.
I don't know if these posts just stick out more but I feel like most posts I see on Political Memes is PugJesus cheerleading the democratic party. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they were on their payroll.
You're so much of a victim, unlike the Palestinians who are being actively genocided while you fervently defend the genocider-in-chief who supports it so hard that he's willing to lose votes over it.
I've got news for you, biden is already actively worsening the situation in Gaza. He's giving israel all they want to carry out their genocide. Don't talk about privilege while you excuse genocide.
Just planting the seeds to manufacture consent for a future war/invasion/destructive action. I assume after Israel fully takes over Palestine, Israel won't have as much of a need to feign friendliness or even neutrality to countries like Saudi Arabia (Egypt is likely also on the hit list). The bad actions of enemy states are always useful to bring up at a later date to build a case for their destruction. For example, China's human rights abuses were allowed to happen for a long time with maybe a call-out here or there (planting the seeds), but the case intensified when China threatening the US's top world economic spot became even a remote possibility.
Syria and Iraq are the ones they've beaten down. Iran is one of the next ones, definitely before Saudi Arabia. Make no mistake, when the other dominoes fall, countries like Saudi Arabia and Egypt are next. It's simple divide and conquer.
Not sure why you're getting downvoted. This is a significant enough feature that a couple seconds is really not a big deal. There are likely time-wasters just as long, if not longer, elsewhere in the game and they do not contribute a much richer audio experience. While I'd love to minimize time wasting as much as possible, this is something that appears once on boot-up while I'm sure there are other time-wasters that appear multiple times while you're playing the game. If they're even a fraction of a second, they will quickly add up more than this logo's time.
Donald Knuth has a great quote on this: "The real problem is that programmers have spent far too much time worrying about efficiency in the wrong places and at the wrong times; premature optimization is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming."
The title states "Masahiro Sakurai refused to add Dolby Surround to a Kirby game because players had to sit through the logo" presumably because you actually cannot have Dolby sound without the logo. Yes, technically you could, but it's likely part of the license agreement and so him refusing to display the logo as outlined by the license means he couldn't use Dolby sound in the game (or would get sued if he went ahead and did it anyway).
The arcade experience is fundamentally different from the console experience. Arcade games are generally crafted to eat quarters and kick players off as soon as possible without making them feel ripped off. Jumping in and out of games is common at arcades. While it's nice to save that couple of seconds on a console game, it's not something that adds up a lot unless you're jumping between games a few minutes at a time, which again, is more like an arcade and doesn't make as much sense in a console gaming context because you generally have a better idea of what games you own and want to play.
As for the second issue, if it was a feature that wasn't worthwhile and that nobody cared about, then why was he considering it in the first place? There are many technical details in games that exist that casual players don't pay attention to, but subconsciously would enjoy. Surround sound adds quite a bit to a racing game, considering that the entire game is about racing against other characters that are positioned all around you.
The way people online constantly say 'talk to your doctor' like it's a panacea is a lot like how medieval peasants weren't able to read scripture and they just had to trust their clergy's interpretations...
One of the nice things about the internet is being able to draw upon the experiences of others. If you're afflicted with something that someone else has had, then there is absolutely the chance that you can get some helpful advice. At the very least, if none of that works, you can then tell your doctor what you tried to narrow things down. After all, an important step in diagnosing is to match symptoms with the underlying condition. Provided that the advice isn't harmful, it doesn't hurt to try and may save you time and money.
That's true, but there's a wide range of things that can be tried before dipping into harmful territory. We should be cultivating an environment of critical thinking. If the reaction is to always immediately defer to experts then you get issues of people taking up healthcare resources for the tiniest issues. Additionally, if you can't trust people to have a bit of sense when applying remedies, then what makes you think they'll choose the correct "experts" to listen to?
Interesting timing on this article given how EVs are really starting to grow in a large way. Reminds me of the articles a few months back about how demand for EVs wasn't "as high as expected" (who is setting these expectations?) even though demand is still growing at breakneck pace. Sounds to me like dinosaurs trying to throttle the growth of EVs so they can keep up sales of internal combustion vehicles, to which I say that maybe they should've invested more into the EV space to reap the rewards instead of dragging their heels at every opportunity. Not to mention the human rights abuses and wars fought to keep the internal combustion vehicle industry going.
I thought macron was floating the idea of committing French troops in Ukraine a while ago, what happened to that stance? All bark and no bite or does he just love the olympics more than Ukraine?
President Volodymyr Zelensky believes that Ukraine's partners "are afraid of Russia losing the war" and would like Kyiv "to win in such a way that Russia does not lose," Zelensky said in a meeting with journalists attended by the Kyiv Independent....
I know that Russia has threatened the use of nukes, but I find it hard to believe they'd actually follow through. Seems like a red line that would activate more direct action from lots of other countries against Russia. Then again, red lines have been made pretty flexible in the past, including recently.
You're not American and don't have a dog in the fight, but you want to explain the electoral system that I participate in to me. Not sure where I insulted you or yelled (no exclamation point or all-caps/bolded words in sight), so it seems like you've completely misinterpreted my post. I didn't say we should "democracy harder", I said we don't have a democracy and that it's just a facade where people get really passionate about voting for one of only two viable options. Kind of hard to save something that doesn't exist. Will things get worse under republicans? Absolutely. Will democrats do anything about that? Absolutely not. They'll keep the office warm until the next time republicans inevitably win back power in this crooked system.
That has to be fake ( sh.itjust.works )
"Of course not - that might hurt my accelerationist dreams!" ( lemmy.world )
Someone stop the ride, I want to get off ( midwest.social )
Lifehack ( file.coffee )
Majority of Americans wrongly believe US is in recession – and most blame Biden ( www.theguardian.com )
Nearly three in five Americans wrongly believe the US is in an economic recession, and the majority blame the Biden administration, according to a Harris poll conducted exclusively for the Guardian. The survey found persistent pessimism about the economy as election day draws closer....
McDonald's is getting rid of self-serve drinks and some locations may charge for refills ( www.cbsnews.com )
Unless you've got a better plan in the next 6 months, grab a fucking bucket ( lemmy.world )
Here's one for the nature lovers ( lemmy.world )
New 9/11 Evidence Points to Deep Saudi Complicity ( www.theatlantic.com )
Masahiro Sakurai refused to add Dolby Surround to a Kirby game because players had to sit through the logo ( www.videogameschronicle.com )
Diet goals ( lemmy.world )
I'm so sick of every single medical-related question people have online constantly getting spammed with 'talk to your doctor!!!!'
The way people online constantly say 'talk to your doctor' like it's a panacea is a lot like how medieval peasants weren't able to read scripture and they just had to trust their clergy's interpretations...
The EV industry can’t shake its human rights abuse problem ( www.theverge.com )
Ukraine’s Zelenskyy rejects Macron’s Olympic truce proposal ( www.politico.eu )
Zelensky: 'Our partners fear that Russia will lose this war' ( kyivindependent.com )
President Volodymyr Zelensky believes that Ukraine's partners "are afraid of Russia losing the war" and would like Kyiv "to win in such a way that Russia does not lose," Zelensky said in a meeting with journalists attended by the Kyiv Independent....
It's okay, tankies love fascism, so they're not put out by the result ( lemmy.world )
Dow hits 40,000 for the first time as bull market accelerates ( www.cbsnews.com )