andrew , to law group
@andrew@esq.social avatar

Boosting for and friends. Important and underreported issue.

Black taxpayers were between 2.9 and 4.7 times more likely to be audited by a data-driven audit algorithm. The IRS' response is that they're making tweaks.

This is insufficient.

Answers. Accountability. What happened? How did an algorithm exhibit decidedly human biases?

@law https://esq.social/@andrew/112478649419844060

andrew , to law group
@andrew@esq.social avatar

I reckon Copilot+ PC is going to be a product that an entire class of professional just simply can't purchase or use for work. Thinking of , , etc.

Surely the "features" will be able to be disabled, but can anyone reasonably trust that?

@law

andrew , to law group
@andrew@esq.social avatar

A House Energy and Commerce Committee Hearing on sunsetting Section 230 is being held today.

One of those bad ideas masquerading as a good one by wearing a cloak made of legitimate complaints. Baby and bath water and all that.

@law

https://energycommerce.house.gov/posts/bipartisan-energy-and-commerce-leaders-announce-legislative-hearing-on-sunsetting-section-230

andrew , to law group
@andrew@esq.social avatar

This is important.

“The IRS finally acknowledged this month what Stanford’s Institute for Economic Policy research uncovered in 2023: Racial disparities in taxpayer audit rates have negatively affected Black taxpayers.

The IRS has committed to reevaluating the mechanisms that caused the disparity and refining their compliance approaches—but tweaking the dials on the algorithm is insufficient.”

@law

https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/irs-racial-audit-disparities-need-accountability-to-be-resolved

heidilifeldman , to Random stuff
@heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

Though not serving as Trump’s attorney when he appeared as a witness today in Trump’s trial for criminally falsifying business records, Robert Costello is a lawyer, bound by New York’s Rules of Professional Conduct. Costello repeatedly showed his ethical unfitness, violating the most basic principles that inform the entire code. I’ve screenshot the very first paragraph of the entire code, highlighting the most pertinent phrases. 1/

ALT
  • Reply
  • Expand (4)
  • Collapse (4)
  • Loading...
  • andrew , to law group
    @andrew@esq.social avatar

    Section 280E functionally turns the federal income tax into a gross receipts for businesses. That might raise some constitutional issues.

    "Marijuana businesses face a unique challenge due to the interplay between state legalization and federal tax law. Under Section 280E, businesses that traffic in controlled substances are ineligible for any deductions or credits for amounts paid or incurred in carrying on their trade or business.”

    @law

    https://news.bloombergtax.com/daily-tax-report/week-in-insights-marijuana-taxation-needs-policies-that-add-up

    JasonPerseus , to Law
    @JasonPerseus@mas.to avatar

    So all the action in opinion is in the concurrences.

    Justice Kagan writes separately in concurrence, joined by Sotomayor, Kavanaugh, and Barrett.

    For which purpose do these four find common ground?

    To grant interpretive weight to traditionalism and evolving practice over time.

    With big, big administrative cases coming up on their docket, perhaps a significant signal?

    JasonPerseus , to Non Political Twitter
    @JasonPerseus@mas.to avatar

    “Alito doesn’t deny the flag was flying upside down, doesn’t deny its meaning, doesn’t express any disapproval for it and doesn’t disavow it.”

    This wasn’t a random period of time. It was AFTER January 6 and BEFORE the inauguration.

    ITS A SYMBOL OF INSURRECTION.

    A Justice has never made a more persuasive case for the Legislature to kick them out on their ass for bad behavior than has Alito.

    https://www.vanityfair.com/news/story/samuel-alito-didnt-give-a-f-k-then-and-he-doesnt-give-a-f-k-now

    heidilifeldman , to Random stuff
    @heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

    I sympathize with Judge Merchan, who I believe has refrained from jailing Trump to avoid allowing Trump to play the victim and raise money off of that. I also think Merchan probably doesn’t want to interrupt the trial for hearings over whether Trump is causing his sycophantic Republican electeds to say things that violate the gag order. But …. 1/

    seanfobbe , to Law
    @seanfobbe@fediscience.org avatar

    🔔 New Blog Post 🔔

    >> UN Security Council: Complete Internal Citation Network Published <<

    I got around to making a full blog post on the new UNSC citation data! Includes an overview, download links, technical info and advice on usage.

    I like the dataviz so much, the text is probably just garnish...

    Link to Blog Post: https://seanfobbe.com/posts/2024-05-14_complete-citation-network-un-security-council-published/

    @histodons @law @politicalscience @rstats

    seanfobbe , to Law
    @seanfobbe@fediscience.org avatar

    🔔 NEW 🔔

    The complete citation network of the UN Security Council up to resolution 2722 (1946-2023) is now and available for download.

    🔹 Citation Data (GraphML) on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/7319781/files/CR-UNSC_2024-05-03_CITATIONS_GRAPHML.zip?download=1
    🔹 Full dataset on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.7319780
    🔹 Codebook on Zenodo: https://zenodo.org/records/7319781/files/CR-UNSC_2024-05-03_Codebook.pdf?download=1

    @histodons @law @politicalscience @rstats

    andrew , to law group
    @andrew@esq.social avatar

    "Mansion" taxes are probably not going to ameliorate inequality anytime soon. Tying much-needed public services, like incentivizing the building of affordable housing, to revenue generated from them is not a good idea.

    @law

    https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/week-in-insights-mansion-tax-debates-wont-end-any-time-soon

    andrew , to Law
    @andrew@esq.social avatar

    In my column this week I discuss the general idea of injecting progressivity into the property tax regime.

    When property values go up, income doesn’t always follow suit. This gives rise to myriad breaks from the FMV—assessment paradigm, which brings with it … problems.

    Key it to income. (Property) tax the rich. Full stop.

    @law

    https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/income-adjusted-property-tax-system-would-foster-homeowner-equity

    seanfobbe , to Law
    @seanfobbe@fediscience.org avatar

    🔔 NEW Dataset 🔔

    The Corpus of Resolutions: UN Security Council (CR-UNSC)

    ✅ 2722 resolutions (1946-2024)
    ✅ All six UN languages
    ✅ 82 Variables
    ✅ Enhanced OCR
    ✅ Citation Data
    and
    ✅ Formats: CSV, PDF, TXT, GraphML, BibTeX

    Full dataset: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.7319780

    Source Code: https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.7319783

    Blog: https://seanfobbe.com/posts/2024-05-06_new-dataset-corpus-of-resolutions-un-security-council/

    @histodons @law @politicalscience @rstats

    design_law , to Random stuff
    @design_law@mastodon.social avatar

    "Goodwin Procter LLP's chair and managing partner told lawyers and business professionals in an email that the firm would be using new technology to monitor time spent in the office as it looks to promote compliance with its hybrid work policy, the firm confirmed to Law360."

    https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1832062?nl_pk=2e71aa9c-c8f8-43ff-9d5a-fafec61b2085

    andrew , to law group
    @andrew@esq.social avatar

    Trump being made a NY resident for tax purposes owing to his trial would be hilarious and awesome.

    @law

    https://news.bloombergtax.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/trumps-new-york-trial-raises-residency-questions-for-state-tax

    GottaLaff , to Random stuff
    @GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

    Via NPR's Tom Dreisbach:

    New investigation:

    Dozens of fed judges attended wk-long seminars at luxury retreats -receiving free rms, free meals, free $ for travel worth 1000s - & failed to fully disclose as required.

    Judges w disclosure issues incl some big names.

    Aileen , currently presiding over ’s docs case, attended 2wk-long seminars at lux resort near Yellowstone Nat Park...failed to upload disclosure w/in 30 days as required.

    Court said it was an “inadvertent” omission.

    heidilifeldman ,
    @heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar
    heidilifeldman ,
    @heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar
    andrew , to law group
    @andrew@esq.social avatar

    Vice taxation (marijuana, gambling, etc.) is being treated by states as "free money" to patch over revenue shortfalls -- while victims of the last great idea (locking up substance users) remain in prison.

    Something about that doesn't sit right with me.

    @law

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/vice-taxation-isnt-free-money-and-should-focus-on-public-good

    heidilifeldman , to Random stuff
    @heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

    Am lamenting anew the refusal by Biden to support Supreme Court reform when Democrats controlled the House and Senate and could have expanded the Court, neutralizing the power of demonstrably corrupt Justice Thomas and the justices appointed after Mitch McConnell illegitimately refused to advance Obama’s nominee to the seat that went eventually to Gorsuch. Elected Democrats must take foundational measures if we are to preserve any sort of meaningful democracy in America. 1/

    GottaLaff , (edited ) to Arizona
    @GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

    Via Kyle Griffin:

    NEW: AG Kris Mayes just announced five of the officials charged in the Arizona fake electors scheme whose name were redacted in the original indictment:

    • John Eastman
    • Boris Epshteyn
    • Christina Bobb
    • Jenna Ellis
    • Mike Roman

    heidilifeldman ,
    @heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar
    heidilifeldman , to Random stuff
    @heidilifeldman@mastodon.social avatar

    Honestly, the Supreme Court justices today sounded even more deranged and clueless than I even expected. They are just too worried about hypothetical future presidents to focus on the fact that we have a former president indicted for attempting to overthrow an election who is now running for reelection on an explicitly authoritarian, anti-democracy platform. 1/

    andrew , to law group
    @andrew@esq.social avatar

    No, Biden has not proposed a general 44.6% long term capital gains rate.

    Just on folks making $1m or more and $400k or more in investment income.

    Not quite the average taxpayer.

    @law

    https://www.forbes.com/newsletters/andrewleahey/2024/04/24/biden-capital-gains-rate-proposal-446/

    andrew , to law group
    @andrew@esq.social avatar

    In this week's column I argue for creating a sales tax lottery that incentivizes folks to keep their receipts and scan them into a database -- entering them in a chance to win and reducing the ability to suppress sales on the merchant's end.

    @law

    https://news.bloomberglaw.com/tax-insights-and-commentary/tax-lottery-would-help-abate-remote-cashier-auditing-nightmare

    skykiss , to Random stuff
    @skykiss@sfba.social avatar

    Americans,

    On Thursday, the will be hearing arguments where lawyers for the criminal defendant are arguing that all former presidents are forever immune from criminal prosecution for any official acts done in office.

    Failure to respect the election of a new President, is the ultimate crime against the people, who are the basis of government. The President, by constitutional design, should have no role- official or unofficial-in the determination of the people's
    vote. Immunity for the crimes here alleged would be most abhorrent to the Framers, because immunity would upset the constitutional scheme and aid a President in overriding the people's power over him.

    The Framers would also have been appalled that Trump, despite having left office, seeks permanent immunity. As a Federalist wrote for the Maryland ratifying convention:

    It seems, however, that the president may possibly be continued for life. He may so, provided he deserve it.

    🧵 1️⃣

    skykiss OP ,
    @skykiss@sfba.social avatar

    The Framers did not put an immunity clause in the .They knew how to, and they did not. They did not provide immunity to the president. Wasn't the whole point that the president was not a monarch and the president was not supposed to be above the law.

    🧵 10/

    Justice Elena Kegan explains that the framers did not put an immunity clause in the Constitution.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • steinbach
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • loren
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • supersentai
  • itdept
  • neondivide
  • space_engine
  • AgeRegression
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • Teensy
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • khanate
  • electropalaeography
  • MidnightClan
  • jeremy
  • fandic
  • All magazines