Collective authorship: are their solutions for when a large (20-30) group of people (#academics, engineers, administrative support staff,...) are to be collectively co-authors of a research output? Something like a collective @ORCID_Org ? An "#ORCID for teams"?
I am thinking of research teams co-authoring a general presentation poster or a final report. We would not have to write their names and orcids in full. And not put some forward some with an order. #OpenScience
“Starting with Volume 35 (2024), Cognitive Linguistics is transformed into a Diamond Open Access journal thanks to our subscribers participating in the Subscribe to Open (S2O) project. All current content will be published under a Creative Commons License (CC-BY 4.0) at no cost to authors and will be freely available to readers.”
"The FORRT Replication Database is a crowdsourced effort to include unpublished and published replication results to estimate and track the replicability along various fields"
Contact @aufdroeseler if you want to be part of the crowd that sources the replications in the literature.
Please boost if you agree that these efforts should get more attention.
The Corpus of Resolutions: UN Security Council (CR-UNSC)
✅ 2722 resolutions (1946-2024)
✅ All six UN languages
✅ 82 Variables
✅ Enhanced OCR
✅ Citation Data
✅ #OpenData and #RStats#OpenSource
✅ Formats: CSV, PDF, TXT, GraphML, BibTeX
45 nations just signed a #declaration to "commit to promote…#OpenScience principles & practices for #data management…, including the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, & Reusability (#FAIR) principles & frameworks for ethical data governance, such as the Collective Benefit, Authority to Control, Responsibility, & Ethics (#CARE) principles,…& ensure the equitable access to scientific literature and research data from public funding." https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/OECD-LEGAL-0501
#HelloESR !
Envie de se former sur le 5e site internet le plus consulté au monde, à savoir #Wikipédia ? De découvrir le potentiel de la base de connaissance #Wikidata ? D'y contribuer avec la #ScienceOuverte ?
Je deviens wikimédienne en résidence pendant un an pour vous y accompagner !
ICYM the Lunch & Learn session about a brief history of #PeerReview, don't worry—we've got you covered!
You can enjoy your weekend and watch it at your convenience on YouTube!
It's our first time there and we'd love connect.
Would you like to exchange best practices, tips, and/or knowledge over coffee? We are interested in #communication strategies for libraries and everything #OpenScience-related. Let us know if you want to meet up!
This year’s State of the Map conference will feature OSM Science 2024, the 7th edition of the Academic Track of State of the Map – a full day of sessions dedicated to academic research about, and with, OpenStreetMap. Authors are invited to submit abstracts (800-1200 words in plain text, without figures) using the OSM Science 2024 Pretalx submission system by 10 May 2024
Note our preprint “The strain on scientific publishing” described recent exponential growth in articles, commenting on so-called “special issues” used by some groups as engines for growth. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15884
Groups like #MDPI publish "Special Issues" piggybacking off an existing terminology to publish something that is distinctly not a “special” issue as if it were.
It’s a failure in our lexicon to not distinguish this new "Special Issue" concept from the traditional one.
We can’t keep talking about “Special Issues” as if they’re a monolith.
Think piece Special Issues have forethought, while Frankenstein Special Issues assemble whatever body parts (papers) they can find. These aren’t products of the same process, let’s stop discussing them as if they are.