🧵 In Apple's recent flurry of frivolous motions in the civil lawsuit, Apple motioned for something so bizarre that I could not find any legal or factual precedent for it. #Apple found a copy of my #SEC#whistleblower complaint (filed to the SEC about Apple) & Apple tried to request Judicial Notice of it for Apple's defense, despite not being a party to it & that also not being how judicial notice works.
The only legal authority Apple cited as a basis for doing this was "Civil Minutes" from an unpublished "In Chambers Order" but even that case was about a SEC complaint that was the SEC suing one of the parties, not a 'confidential' whistleblower tip the other side wasn't party to
Apple can't get judicial notice for my complaint because Apple cannot authenticate it, because Apple wasn't party to it nor did Apple request an affidavit from me about it.
In addition, there's much case law explaining the Defendant can't judicial notice stuff to simply build a defense for a motion to dismiss a Plaintiff's complaint.
After I responded to Apple's motion with actual facts & law, Apple replied via its motions for judicial notice & motion to dismiss, now belligerently insisting that I must prove my SEC complaint is "protected activity", and claiming that I 'understand' its 'not' protected activity because I refused to bicker with Apple substantively point by point on a frivolous motion that was clearly only meant to harass me.