Nonilex , to Random stuff
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

All right, who’s ready to see get his just desserts? He fucked up the whole damn world & that’s not an overstatement.

PS baby squirrel & I had a lovely weekend. It’s as boy! (He’s developed discernible - stuff)
He is doing quite well!

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

#TrumpTrial has begun

#Trump’s #criminal trial for falsifying business records during the 2016 presidential campaign to hide an extramarital affair that occurred while his 4th(?) wife was pregnant from his majority #evangelical #Christian #electorate; to that end he arranged an illegal & financially fraudulent #HushMoney pay-off to the adult-film actress #StormyDaniels.

Once the prosecutor & Trump’s #legal team have outlined their cases to the jury, the 1st witnesses will be called.

#law

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Lawyers indicated that their opening statements will take a little more than an hour combined. Justice Juan also noted that one reached out before court resumed to express nervousness about the media attention surrounding the case, but the judge added that the juror is still here.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Earlier, falsely claims area is ‘completely CLOSED DOWN’ to protesters again suggesting there is a for him & his supporters, when evidence supports the opposite.

Facts: ~100 protesters at Columbia arrested. Outside courthouse, there are some bike-rack-type barriers (haven’t we learned those are ineffective?), but have been chanting & walking on the sidewalk. The park outside the courthouse was closed off very early Monday, now it’s unlocked.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

read his decision re:

the finding that he misstated his assets; his 2 violations of a stemming from that case; 2 separate court findings of of ; & the dissolution of the foundation as part of a settlement w/the NYAG. The judge said he would not allow prosecutors to discuss in detail the underlying facts of those matters — but added a warning that could change.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

“The court cautions defendant that this ruling is a shield, not a sword,” Merchan said. Defense arguments at court could prompt him to reconsider where he draws the line on these issues, he added.

The is now in the courtroom. Justice Juan is reading them their instructions.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Expected to be the first witness in the is , the fmr publisher of the , who bought & buried damaging stories about in a scheme to unlawfully the 2016 presidential election.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

opening statements have begun.

Matthew , one of the Manhattan DA’s prosecutors, up.

Per Jonah Bromwich:
“Colangelo is known for his writing, but he has very little experience in Manhattan criminal court — I’ve never heard him give an opening before. He begins by telling the jury that lied “over & over & over” again by disguising business records.”

skykiss , to Law
@skykiss@sfba.social avatar

Monday, April 22 opening statements in the criminal trial of the biggest criminal in American history.

Manhattan Jury Hears Trump Committed 'Pure and Simple' Election Fraud.

This was a planned, coordinated, long-running conspiracy to help Donald Trump get the criminal elected and deny voters the true facts.

Prosecutors at hush money trial say Trump led 'porn star payoff' scheme to 'corrupt' 2016 election.

Former National Enquirer David Pecker is also expected to take the stand as the first witness for the prosecution, a source with direct knowledge of the situation told NBC News

Trump’s part in the hush money scheme was a crime,
Trump knew it was a crime,
Trump falsified the documents, and
Trump falsified the documents with the intent to cover a crime.

ProPublica , to Law
@ProPublica@newsie.social avatar

Resists U.S. Plan to Bring Sanctions Against Israeli Unit

After months of inaction, Secretary of State Antony is poised to bar U.S. aid to an unit accused of human rights abuses.

https://www.propublica.org/article/netanyahu-resists-blinken-plan-sanction-against-israeli-military-unit

skykiss , to Random stuff
@skykiss@sfba.social avatar

Americans,

On Thursday, the will be hearing arguments where lawyers for the criminal defendant are arguing that all former presidents are forever immune from criminal prosecution for any official acts done in office.

Failure to respect the election of a new President, is the ultimate crime against the people, who are the basis of government. The President, by constitutional design, should have no role- official or unofficial-in the determination of the people's
vote. Immunity for the crimes here alleged would be most abhorrent to the Framers, because immunity would upset the constitutional scheme and aid a President in overriding the people's power over him.

The Framers would also have been appalled that Trump, despite having left office, seeks permanent immunity. As a Federalist wrote for the Maryland ratifying convention:

It seems, however, that the president may possibly be continued for life. He may so, provided he deserve it.

🧵 1️⃣

skykiss OP ,
@skykiss@sfba.social avatar

If not, he retires to obscurity, without even the consolation of having produced any of the convulsions, attendant usually on grand revolutions. Should he be wicked or frantic enough to make the attempt, he attones for it, with the certain loss of wealth, liberty or life.

The Founding Generation sought to ensure that, unlike a king, the President would not acquire any special status that would carry forward after the end of his term. Instead, the President would be "elected from the mass of the people, and, on the expiration of the time for which he is elected, return to the mass of the people again."

Former President Trump evidently does not wish to bear the burdens of "the mass of the people" again. That's understandable; no one enjoys being held to account. But Founding Era history provides former President Trump no solace in his efforts to evade the ordinary operation of law.

🧵

Information from Amicus curiae brief to scotus.

Nonilex , to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

A man set himself on fire on Friday afternoon near the Lower Manhattan where continued in the of .

The man doused himself w/a liquid around 1:35PM ET in Collect Pond Park, across the street from the courthouse. Onlookers screamed as bright orange flames engulfed the man. It was unclear what motivated his action.


https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/19/nyregion/man-on-fire-trump.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

Nonilex , to Law
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

From transcript:

BLANCHE: …I would ask that the People provide us w/the names of their first 3 witnesses so that we can prepare...

STEINGLASS: Look, I got to be honest: That's a courtesy that we normally extend. [but] Mr. has been tweeting about the witnesses. We're not telling who the witnesses are.

MERCHAN: I can't fault the People for that.

CultureDesk , (edited ) to Video Games
@CultureDesk@flipboard.social avatar

Video games, LeBron James, tattoos, and copyright law, in one story? The internet is really spoiling us today. @polygon reports on a long-drawn-out case in which tattoo artist Jimmy Hayden is suing Take-Two Interactive Software, makers of the NBA 2K video games, over the use of tattoos he made for LeBron James that were reproduced in games from 2016 to 2020. Hayden's attorney argues that Take-Two "painstakingly copied" the designs. Take-Two's team says that James' tattoos are a very small part of NBA 2K, and that James has licensed his own likeness to Take-Two, so a ruling in favor of Hayden would mean James would have to ask Hayden for permission to license his own being. Here are all the details, plus background on other cases in which tattoo artists have sued video game companies. What do you think?

https://flip.it/1.JDIf

For more stories like this, follow @polygon's Gaming Magazine, @gaming-polygon.

3x10to8mps , to Law
@3x10to8mps@vmst.io avatar

Michael Cohen is on a live interview on YouTube, right now, with very anti-Trump organization

How can he be a witness in the trial if he's spouting all this stuff ABOUT the trial currently underway??? Where's the DA?

@GottaLaff

Nonilex , to Random stuff
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Probably won’t cover as extensively unless things get interesting, but ’s / trial is back on today w/ continued selection.

A was quickly dismissed at the start. She was among the 7 already selected, she said she was very worried that despite the fact the court ruled to keep jurors’ name secret, she would still be exposed & targeted.


https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/04/18/nyregion/trump-hush-money-trial?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The jury in the is going to see a lot of paperwork , & prosecutor Joshua Steinglass explained to the prospective .
“As jurors you’re going to have to analyze the evidence, apply your common sense & draw the appropriate conclusions from that evidence. You’re going to have to roll up your sleeves & get into the weeds a little bit,” Steinglass said
That evidence will include voluminous checks, emails, invoices & texts, he said.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

“We’re going to ask you to be patient as we walk you through all those documents in what sometimes may seem like excruciating detail.”
The potential jurors, called on individually by Steinglass, said they could do that.

is reportedly staring intently at the jury box as the goes on. He (again) shakes his head as Steinglass references someone being “criminally liable” for the acts of others.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Steinglass explains the concept of “accessorial liability.” He uses the same analogy he did on Tues: a husband hiring a hitman to murder his wife, he asks prospective if they would understand the husband to be of the . Today, though, the lawyers object. overrules, & the hitman question stands.

Steinglass managed to compare coordinating the falsification of docs w/a husband putting out a hit on his wife.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Steinglass wrapped up by asking whether any of the 18 prospective jurors would have trouble finding if prosecution proves its case. He asks each individually. Not one expresses any concerns about doing so.

Susan Necheles, defense, is up. She begins by saying she has “the honor of representing President Trump."🤮

This could backfire if any prospective jurors are irked by hearing Trump referred to in the “dear leader” way he insists.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

will likely be pleased w/Necheles's . She questioned the of those who are expected to testify against Trump, & made a reference to , suggesting that some might want to seek “revenge” (the title of a Cohen books) on Trump. Cohen’s book is specifically named on the questionnaire.

Trump gives the hairy eyeball to jurors when Necheles suggests that a witness may be lying if they change the details of their story.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Necheles, Trump's atty, is trying to get the jurors to say they don’t like .

Prospective jurors are mostly answering that their disagreements w/Trump as president won’t impact their impartiality.

Necheles appears to be trying to draw prospective jurors into lying, which would be reason to dismiss them “for cause.” The defense has a limited number of opportunities to dismiss prospective for no reason at all, this is a way around using those.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The latter prospective juror's voice reportedly shook as she basically insulted Trump. She says of his personality: “It's not my cup of tea”

[I’d probably be less diplomatic]

is staring at her from the defense table.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

Another prospective juror interviewed by Necheles, says she is very "centrist." She says she appreciates & a diversity of opinion. But, says, "I really don't think this case is about my politics, this case is ultimately about the & the presented." She concludes by saying that her family background "comes from regimes," & that bc of that, she believes in "innocent until proven guilty."

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

's lawyer, Susan Necheles, confronted many prospective about their activity, clearly the lawyers know things about them, a lot of which was not stuff they were asked in open court. They clearly have people doing deep dives on these people. It’d be pretty hard to not have concerns that their identities will be leaked

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

The prospective left for the lawyers discussion, some may be brought back in for individual interviews. The defense & the prosecution may both seek to strike jurors "for cause." If they can't do so, they will use their limited number of peremptory challenges, which allow them to excuse jurors w/o a reason.

Those who survive challenges will be seated on the jury unless this process has given them the concerns articulated above.

Nonilex OP ,
@Nonilex@masto.ai avatar

More about the question of whether violated his by posting a quote from ' , Trump didn’t “repost” Watters, he wrote out his own post referencing Watters’s false characterization of prospective jurors.


  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • khanate
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • steinbach
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • loren
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • Mordhau
  • itdept
  • neondivide
  • space_engine
  • AgeRegression
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • Teensy
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • electropalaeography
  • supersentai
  • MidnightClan
  • jeremy
  • fandic
  • All magazines