bloodfart

@bloodfart@lemmy.ml

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

bloodfart ,

I make the same comment in all these threads, but you don’t have to vote for Biden. I’m planning on voting psl this November and you can too.

bloodfart ,

Party for socialism and liberation. They’re running Claudia de la Cruz this go round.

bloodfart , (edited )

Do not fall for the idea that changing to some other method of voting will fix anything.

Plenty of European nations have all manner of goofy voting systems and parliamentary governments and they’re all still getting fascist parties and coalitions.

Even if we thanos-snapped ourselves into star or ranked choice or some other cheese eating surrender monkey voting style we’d still actually have to be not okay with our government sending 2000lb guided bombs to be dropped on hospitals.

That starts with not voting for Biden because a vote can only ever be seen as a show of support. There is no way to mark the little bubble that says “I’m only doing this to keep trump out of office” or the one labeled “wish it was anyone else”.

You can only show support with a vote and I urge you not to show support for Biden.

You should feel proud of your third party vote in 2016, I sure do. You can say a lot of bad things about trump, but he never laughed about having a nations leader sodomized to death with a knife on daytime tv.

bloodfart ,

Our system of government forms a feedback loop with our social system. We can certainly change how we vote but without changing both the government and social system, modifications to our election process only change the interlink between the two. It’s clear from other extant nations dealing with fascist movements that a different interlink doesn’t fundamentally alter how both the government and social systems respond to material conditions.

It’s not giving up to recognize that a new transmission won’t fix a blown engine and stripped differential.

We might need a new transmission too, but it ain’t gettin us to pismo beach unless the rest is straightened out.

I’m not “fine” with another trump term, and I’m not “fine” with Bidens term or another one.

We are getting fascism. We have, right this very moment, got fascism.

We cannot fight fascism with gentler fascism or inclusive fascism or fascism with a welfare state, we can fight it with socialism, anarchism or communism.

To step away from the polemic for a little bit it’s interesting that you said we shouldn’t vote third party but instead should try to change the voting system. Here I am just asking people to do the easiest thing ever, mark a different box on a piece of paper, and the response is “no, before you do that simple, easy to accomplish thing you have to fundamentally alter how we choose officials!”

I don’t bring it up to make fun of you, because several other people have said that to me, but to ask what motivates that? I mean, do you think the only acceptable outcome for a political party is victory?

bloodfart ,

Your vote for Biden is only a vote for Biden. It will never be a vote against trump. It will only ever signify support for Biden assistance and denial of a genocide.

The democrats don’t have a crystal ball, they can’t tell that you wish they would run someone else or that you feel forced to vote for their candidate despite his monstrous platform. They will only see support. They will only see what they can get away with.

bloodfart ,

The best guide is learning the skills needed to solve problems. Both people already have those, the power user probably knows how to get windows to do what they want and the other person probably figured out how to get the results they need without finagling as much with the computer.

It’s never too late to learn something new and the “man” and “info” commands are a huge help!

bloodfart ,

A bunch of people said resolvd already and I hate to admit it, but this fixed dns over tls for me too.

Mark it as a rare systemd w.

bloodfart ,

It was a while ago and I’m on Debian so my experience might be different but last named version I had to put a line pointing to the internal resolved address in resolv.conf like in this forum thread.

bloodfart ,

Aluminum coil transformers produce more waste heat and are more susceptible to vibration than copper coil.

Ev motors are big coils.

It’s gotta be copper.

bloodfart ,

I mean, you’re right, but we can’t use braided aluminum wire to make the coils in transformers and motors, so aluminums greater conductivity by mass is undercut by not being able to take advantage of that property because the engineering for motors and transformers dictates solid wire of a specific diameter.

Also an aluminum winding transformer or motor needs a bigger slug to deal with the more than double resistivity and at some point the benefits of aluminums cheapness and lightness disappear when you gotta have more heavy iron in the core, more heat and more winding failure due to vibration.

I don’t think that means we’re not gonna see ev motors with aluminum windings, just that they’ll be in shitty cheap vehicles for poor people.

bloodfart , (edited )

Some of the stuff about that company says it’s doing aluminum windings and some of it says they’re doing no windings with flux barriers and air gaps. What’s up with that, different experimental technologies?

I’m skeptical of their claims about it being environmentally friendly since more stuff made out of aluminum means more aluminum being pulled out of the ground, but it’ll be interesting to see that develop.

E: their claim that it’s environmentally friendly because it’s got less rare earths makes sense now because they gotta use iron instead cause of the resistivity. I’m genuinely interested to see how much weight or volume savings they get and the efficiency for a given power output compared to a traditional copper and rare earth motor.

It really seems like a strange step backwards (not an insult, plenty of old technologies are perfectly valid and their manufacturing techniques need to still exist) to get cheaper components that sidestep the cost of shipping recycled copper around.

At some point the high cost of recycled materials has to be integrated into the supply chain somehow otherwise the benefit of having recycled them will never be realized. This technology seems like a scheme to increase consumption without dealing with the consequences of previous consumption.

bloodfart ,

i'm never voting for joe biden again and if youre reading this, you don't have to either.

consider voting for the party for socialism and liberation.

bloodfart ,

i'm planning on voting psl this november, like i suggested in my post.

bloodfart ,

Voting third party is voting.

I support psls’ platform mostly. Chiming in on threads about the election helps people see that there is an alternative to voting in support of the genocide. That helps “my” cause.

bloodfart ,

ur-fascism is a text about semiotics, not politics.

while it can be useful in decoding political stuff, it's not a tool intended for that use, like scraping paint with a flathead screwdriver.

while i don't think it's out of the ordinary to reference the fourteen points, ur-fascism is absolutely convoluted and not considered a standard interpretation of the politics of fascist movements. in ecos defense, most semioticians are incapable of writing without convolution for obvious reasons.

i'm not saying this to be pedantic, but to maybe help someone reading along to understand why anyone would reference ecos fourteen points. they make a lot more sense when theyre taken as an outline of fascism's semiotic content, not a checklist of actions some regime needs to meet before it's officially fascist or else be considered merely sparkling corporatism.

bloodfart ,

whats the recommended method of dealing with old reiser partitions once kernel support gets removed?

bloodfart ,

i guess i'm asking how do i migrate them to newer filesystems once kernel support is removed. surely i'll still be able to modprobe it back in...

bloodfart ,

I guess I gotta put an old Slackware cd in with that drawer full of reiser drives.

bloodfart , (edited )

E: ut announcer: DOUBLE POST!

bloodfart ,

By the time I get around to shuffling through a bunch of old drive it very well could be!

bloodfart ,

if you use obs for streaming i've had better stability out of it on linux than on mac or windows. probably says more about obs than those oses though.

new vegas is gold support listed on protondb, so it probably works fine

do a dual boot install so you can go back when you need to. that means before you install inux, chkdisk, defrag and turn off bitlocker.

make a backup.

bloodfart ,

conicals are good for the small smd parts though, when having a huge contact area and big thermal mass means completely desoldering the part and dragging it off the board when you pull away.

of course, those aren't the conicals on a $20 orange handle plug in iron...

bloodfart ,

you'll be fine.

do a dual boot install and play around with reaper. setup wine and see how it does with steven slate.

people are saying use ardour. i don't like it, but you might. my computer music needs are limited to midi and recording inputs, not performing actual synthesis and sampling "in the box".

bloodfart ,

it really reaps the llamas ass.

were you able to get the steven slate vsts running in some host?

bloodfart ,

Good luck. If Steven slate keeps fucking up your christmas it might be possible to duplicate what you use it for using a native effects package.

bloodfart ,

Now we just need open source directx and direct draw so all the visualizations work and we’re in business.

bloodfart ,

They can’t keep doing this.

Fine, sigh

Agama balls

bloodfart ,

You have two problems.

Transferring between your laptop and desktop is slow. There’s a bunch of reasons that this could be. My first thought is that the desktops got a slow 100mbps nic or not enough memory. You could also be using something that’s resource intensive and slow like zfs/zpools or whatever. It’s also possible your laptops old g WiFi is the bottleneck or that with everything else running at the same time it doesn’t have the memory to hold 40tb worth of directory tree.

Plug the laptop into the Ethernet and see if that straightens up your problems.

You want to work with the contents of desktop while away from its physical location. Use a vpn or overlay network for this. I have a complex system so I use nebula. If you just want to get to one machine, you could get away with just regular old openvpn or wireguard.

E: I just reread your post and the usb is likely the problem. Even over 2.0 it’s godawful. See if you can migrate some of those disks onto the sata connectors inside your desktop.

bloodfart ,

You’re getting a lot of advice in this thread and it’s all pretty good, but not all of it seems to answer the problems you have in your order of priority or under your constraints. I’ll try to give an explanation of why I think my advice will do so then give it.

Getting off usb will speed up file access and increase the number of operations you can do from the laptop on your lan. Some stuff will still need to be copied over locally, normal people like us just can’t afford the kind of infrastructure that lets you do everything over the lan. For those things, rsync is perfectly good, and they’re most likely going to be enough of an edge case that it won’t be very often.

When you’re ready, and from your responses in this thread I’d say you are, a vpn doesn’t expose you to much security risk if any. There are caveats to that, but if you’re doing something like openvpn or wireguard it’s all encrypted and key based and basically ain’t nobody getting into it unless they were to get a key off an old computer you use and didn’t wipe before throwing out or something. That would solve your remote access bonus problem. No pressure and in your own time, of course.

You are me twenty years ago.

Cobbling together solutions from what’s available at the cost of the parts from the hardware store. Serial experiments lain but shot in the trailer park boys set. Hackers with the cast of my name is earl.

Don’t ever change.

So you want to kick the bad habit but don’t have enough physical space in your desktops case or enough sata ports! You have a bigger tower case but don’t know if it’ll really hold the drives you want.

The best bet is to transplant the motherboard and power supply from your sff desktop into the big case. If the big case has at least three 5 1/4 bays you can use a bracket to go from 3 big bays to 4 or 5 smaller 3.5” hdd bays. I’d recommend 4 instead of 5, more on that later.

If the big tower case has the little dangly 2x 3.5 bay cage hanging down from its cd cage, you can use four strips of sheet metal and a carpenters square (or the square corner of some copy paper) to make a column of hdd mounting space all the way to the floor of the chassis. Just remember to use vibration damping grommets.

Make sure when you’re filling your tower up with drives to put some fans blowing on em. Drives need to be kept cool for maximum life. Those 3 cd bay to 4 hdd bay adapter brackets are nice for that because they usually have a fan mount or one included.

Now you need sata (or maybe ide) ports to plug all these in. Someone else already said to use those cheap little sata expanders and those are great. I used an old cheap pc mounted in a salvaged case just like you might with four of em back in the day.

You’ll actually want to use the towers power supply if it has one and it works and matches the sff desktops connectors because it probably has more power capacity than the sff desktops supply. You may need some molex or sata splitters to get power to all your drives.

Consider mergerfs and snapraid once you have this wheezing Frankensteins monster operational.

Mergerfs displays all the drives as one big file system to the system and to users. So if drive one had /pics/dog.jpg and drive two had /pics/cat.jpg then the mergerfs of the two of them would have both pictures in the /pics directory when you open it.

Snapraid is like if raid5 (really zpools because you can have many parity devices) but it only runs once a day or whatever and is basically a snapshot.

Anyway sorry for the tangent. Post some pics of the tower case or its model number or whatever and I can give better advice about filling it with drives.

bloodfart ,

Hey I’m replying again directly to your post in the hopes that I can push against some of the advice you’re getting. My intent is to do an end run around arguing with the people making these suggestions because they’re very smart and made them for good reasons but their ideas aren’t necessarily good for you and I don’t want you to have to go through a troublesome recovery like I did and many people on the internet have.

Do not under any circumstances set up raid or zpools for your data drives once you get them inside a case and on the pcie bus somehow.

In these configurations accessing a file requires spinning up all the drives in the array or pool. Not only is that putting wear and tear on your drives, it increases the temperature of the case and draws much more power. Those conditions lead to drive failure. When your drive fails and you have a spare to use in its place, resilvering (the process of using extra data called parity to rebuild the contents of the failed drive on the spare one) will put those exact conditions on your remaining drives.

For people like us, who may not have a hot spare, or great cooling, or an offsite backup, an array like that will set us up for failure rather than resilience.

Please consider using mergerfs or something like it and a snapshot parity system like snapraid instead.

There are very good use cases for the raid and zpool systems that have been brought up, but you aren’t there. I got there at moderate expense and moved away from them.

bloodfart ,

good luck. what'd you end up figuring out to access your files quicker?

bloodfart ,

lol we already have fascism. They’re crushing antiwar protests, the media is in lockstep, labor demonstrations have been broken and they’re pissing away the cost of healthcare, free college and any number of other benefits on supplying a genocide.

I’m never gonna vote for Biden again and if you don’t want to either, consider voting for the party for socialism and liberation.

You don’t have to support the genocide.

bloodfart ,

Will you always pick the “better” of the two parties? If not, how bad does it need to get before you vote third party? I like to ask it this way: where’s your red line?

bloodfart ,

It’s not pitching a fit to recognize that both of the two major parties candidates are unacceptable.

There’s a big difference between pitching a fit and saying “genocide is my red line.”

What’s your red line? What would cause you to vote third party instead of Biden?

bloodfart ,

So no amount of parallel awfulness would prompt you to reject both parties? As an example, if the atrocities being visited on Gaza took place in America would that be enough?

bloodfart ,

Personally it wasn’t the genocide that put me off ever voting Biden, but I wouldn’t describe a person for whom that’s a bridge too far as cheap.

It’s also not throwing your vote away to vote third party. If it were there wouldnt be an effect to it, and of course there clearly is. A third party vote means that party gets more funding, airtime and media exposure.

There are powerful examples of third parties in the us exerting significant pressure on policy while also not being spoilers.

So how much would be too much for you? our children dying in our streets by us weapons?

bloodfart ,

The democrats candidate is using his executive power to send arms to israel so they can perform war crimes. How much more openly fascist, cruel and hateful does he need to be? How much worse can a candidate get than the alternative when they’re literally doing something terrible that the alternative didn’t?

Voting for the administration that’s encouraging a crackdown on antiwar protests and supplying a genocide because you want to make sure it’ll be open to change.

I don’t have to want trump to win to see the absolute absurdity of that position.

I’m not saying all that to demean or belittle you, but instead to hopefully illustrate that we can’t build a just world by voting for Biden.

bloodfart ,

You don’t need fundamental change to the system to not vote for the president committing a genocide. You can just pick someone else. That’s the point of a vote.

bloodfart ,

The daily volume of human suffering already bypassed that unleashed by the us after 9/11.

How much worse does it need to get before you wash your hands of this bloody administration?

Is there even a point where you’d turn your back on Biden?

bloodfart ,

That’s not true.

I use Perot 92 as a counter example, because if the significant influence that campaign had on the ultimate fate of nafta and how it turned out not to have acted as a spoiler.

Why would you say your feelings in a protest or a letter to your congressman but not in your ballot where it literally gets counted?

bloodfart ,

If you would prefer a logical, utilitarian argument for voting third party I’ll happily oblige.

What are the prior assumptions your argument for voting for Biden rests upon? It’s easiest for me to work from what you already hold true.

bloodfart ,

Back in ‘99 there was a paper that showed Perot had the most impact the opposite direction, reducing Clinton’s margin of victory. I remember it because back then it made the news that what everyone thought to be obviously true (the businessman from Texas’ campaign spoiled the republican vote) was wrong. It’s even cited in the Wikipedia article about Perot 92!

Florida literally went against bush jr in the recount and his brother who was the governor of Florida at the time had a significant impact on calling it before the recount came in.

Now once again: why would you make your feelings known in a protest, but not when they can actually be counted?

bloodfart ,

Okay: if the only vote acceptable to you is one that results in a win for that candidate or could feasibly result in a win for that candidate, you’re discounting a good portion of the outcomes of even the flawed American electoral system and how they effect the future.

Vote tallies are used to determine funding, ballot presence, debate opportunities, media representation and of course, public awareness.

It’s also important to recognize that we are not given the opportunity to vote against one or more candidates. There is no bubble on the scantron form that will indicate “I’m only doing this to keep the other guy out of office” or “I only support your platform on guns”.

We are given only the ability to voice support for candidates, their platforms and actions, with no room for nuance or debate.

Candidates and their teams and administrations aren’t shown weather or not you protested the arms shipments, spoke in defense of abortion or moved resolutions condemning the genocide forward in your local governments.

They will only see your vote.

Your vote for Biden is not a vote against trump, it is a vote of support for Biden and his fascist policy of genocide.

I am not making an appeal to emotion with that last sentence and hopefully the time and text spent to raise it to the level of logical and utilitarian shows that.

If you took all emotion out of your decision in November and purely cast your ballot based entirely upon utility, your analysis could very easily conclude that there is no acceptable option to support between the two major parties and that it’s better to be counted supporting a third party you would like to see more of in 2026, 2028 and beyond.

I’ve talked about red lines over and over in this thread and while I like the phrase because it’s something everyone can understand, I’m afraid it evokes the constantly shifting goalposts of our politicians own red lines and that limits its effectiveness. Instead of describing the hypothetical or real actions of candidates as red lines, I’ll use other phrases here to hopefully get the point across more clearly.

When giving support to either candidates platforms and actions is beyond the pale, a bridge too far, simply unacceptable to you using whatever methodology is appropriate to you, the only reasonable utilitarian, logical choice is to lend your counted and measured support to a party, candidate and platform you want to see next time.

If you can’t support the actions of the current regime or its opponent than this election is lost to you.

Now if we look beyond the actual votes themselves to the effect peoples discourse has on politicians platforms before the elections themselves it becomes even more difficult to defend saying “vote blue no matter who” or that you’ll be marking a straight ticket or whatever.

If we assume the pollsters and political parties are paying attention and using our discourse to modify their own platforms and actions in order to get support then it’s more utilitarian and logical to be posting about how you’ll never vote for the platform of genocide or that the democrats should dump Biden at the convention than it is to be speaking in opposition to those views because an administration that sees lots of people saying they need to change course or lose those votes come November is more likely to actually change course than one who sees lots of opposition to those voices in the form of “voting against trump”, “vote blue no matter who” or “harm reduction”.

That is of course if you’re against the genocide.

bloodfart , (edited )

so if you can't trust that your discussion will be heard and believed it's even more important to withhold your vote! if they're not gonna be able to figure out who's a real american disgusted with the administration and who's an op, the only way you can communicate is by not supporting the party doing a genocide using your vote.

my last sentence isn't an appeal to emotion, it's something i added after proofreading to make sure my arguments were all logically sound. in all our comments, you and i never established that part and as silly and pedantic as it is, that's part of making a sound logical argument.

as i said before, neither you nor i can vote against trump. we're not afforded that ability. we can't express through the ballot box that we want anybody but him. we can't have a ballot counted "i'm only doing this to keep trump out". what the american political process does allow us to do is express support for parties and their platforms. if a person votes biden, they're not voting "not trump", they're voting "biden". biden is aiding a genocide. a vote for biden is only interpret-able by the democrats as support for biden's actions. a vote for biden is literally a vote for genocide in that case.

the democrats have not been shifted left in at least forty years. it would be illogical to expect that expressing support for their rightward shift during biden's administration and their fascist crackdown on antiwar protests and aiding of a genocide through your biden ballot would make that change.

I am not saying the following to support republicans, but to build towards a point: republicans didn't force this kind of choice. republicans didn't send billions of aid to israel, enough to implement lots of the social programs and reforms democrats can't ever seem to get done. republicans aren't running a president who literally said he wasn't going to seek a second term. republicans didn't break the rail strike.

at some point if you don't want to have all those failures, if you want to be able to push the democrats left, if you want to have a future that includes the reforms and social programs they promise and never deliver, they have to see that a constant rightward tack isn't gonna win elections.

if no one is able to tell what discourse is real and what discourse is fake, your only choice to push the democrats left is to withhold your vote from them and record it for a party you actually believe in the platform of. there will be a record of votes cast for that party and after the dust settles, democrat strategists can say "gosh, it looks like abandoning the left, arab americans and people of color was a mistake".

on the other hand, if you feel like there is a way to distinguish real flesh and blood americans who won't tolerate this abhorrent administration from the ostensible bots and foreign trolls, join me in yelling at the top of your lungs that biden has to stop the genocide, or that the democrats have to drop him at the convention, or really anything except "we have to oppose trump".

because there's more utility in that, more logic in joining a chorus calling for justice even when it includes people you might see as your enemy than the utility and logic in doubling down and supporting what you know to be wrong.

e: spelling in a few places

bloodfart ,

you mean in the case of a dead USB ic or something or do you mean the USB port isnt standard?

bloodfart ,

Why not tell me your opinion?

Come on, your ideas are worth hearing!

bloodfart ,

I haven’t been advocating for trump. That’s what you mean, right?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • steinbach
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • loren
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • supersentai
  • itdept
  • neondivide
  • space_engine
  • AgeRegression
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • Teensy
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • khanate
  • electropalaeography
  • MidnightClan
  • jeremy
  • fandic
  • All magazines