GlitterInfection

@GlitterInfection@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

GlitterInfection ,

I canceled my Disney+ sub due to the price increase during the great enshitification race to the bottom, but their support for VisionOS and immersive content is making me rethink that.

GlitterInfection ,

I do, yeah.

GlitterInfection ,

Watching the 3D version of Mad Max: Fury Road with it reflecting off the lake in the Mount Hood environment while flying cross country sold me on never flying without a VR headset again. It was one of the most comfortable flights I've had and one of the more enjoyable and memorable movie watching experiences despite having seen the movie before.

On the way back I was able to play the inflight entertainment in headset, and the wifi was good enough to stream video so I watched RuPaul content on youtube and Wow Presents Plus while texting friends. It was also a solid experience.

No motion sickness in either case, but also I didn't play any games or anything that usually makes someone motion sick in VR. This was all on my Vision Pro, so hopefully it works as well on the Quest headsets.

GlitterInfection ,

This reference is so old, that Johnny 5 must be dead by now.

GlitterInfection ,

Which is why the robot voice actors should unionize. It's a crime that human voice actors have been stealing their jobs for so long!

GlitterInfection ,

Why bother with that? If you need shoes to dissolve, regardless of the materials, just subject them to my foot sweat for a few months.

GlitterInfection ,

Fun fact, The Suicide Squad (2021) was a box office flop, whereas Suicide Squad (2016), the only academy award winning DCEU film, was a box office smash hit!

GlitterInfection ,

It still failed to hit projected box office returns with that factored in!

It's just funny because it's a good movie and the first one won an academy award but is terrible.

And they won it for writing "damaged" on Joker's forehead... at least in part.

GlitterInfection ,

Do you count prequels as spin-off shows? Both Better Call Saul and House of the Dragon are considered to be excellent and successful if so.

GlitterInfection ,

Kids out of college who are grateful that they're being given a chance to follow their passion don't think they have collective bargaining power, and the people who stay in the industry tend to do so because they enjoy pain.

GlitterInfection ,

It's almost like a prequel wasn't a good idea. 🤔

GlitterInfection ,

The fediverse has a built-in search engine?

I can only comment on my experience searching for communities in lemmy and people to follow on mastadon, but in both cases I am not sure I'd say "works quite well" would describe my experience.

But also that's not what I think OP was talking about.

They want a search engine for a random fact like google. It's been long true that you need to add "reddit" to the end of any google search to find the info you needed.

It'd be nice to have a fediverse alternative.

GlitterInfection ,

This is the worst I've seen, and absolutely not compliant with GDPR.

GlitterInfection ,

Except Apple did better than analysts forecasted, and announced a buyback, causing the stock price to go up.

He lost money compared to if he had waited until after.

GlitterInfection ,

Well, by now they've probably seen all the films.

If it happened a long time ago in a galaxy far far away and has made it to our backwater planet, then it must be pretty widely popular.

GlitterInfection OP ,

Why?

GlitterInfection OP , (edited )

Source?

The article contains videos. There are examples of apps that some of the companies have released.

Seems like, yes, they do.

GlitterInfection OP ,

You dismiss "editing videos" as if that's not an incredibly useful to be able to do that. I have been taking 2D videos, upscaling them and generating spatial videos with various iPad and VisionOS native apps a lot lately and the results are fantastic!

But you state a lot of things as fact, so I should ask, have you used one at all?

GlitterInfection OP ,

In a Fortune 500 company $4,000 would not raise an eyebrow on an expense report. Companies using MR for professional use-cases aren't likely buying a Quest. They're likely using a Varjo, which consumers can't even purchase, and which ranges from as expensive as the Vision Pro to more 3 times as expensive as the one.

I think there's a lot of Apple hate oriented opinions on the Vision Pro, and it's unfortunate that it is so expensive that most people can't get one who might have been on the fence. But the actual experience is pretty great, and especially so compared with what's out there.

I hate linking to reddit threads on lemmy but it's marginally better than linking X. Jon Chu seems to think that video editing in the VisionPro does offer a significant advantage to the workflow:

https://www.reddit.com/r/editors/comments/1akjeic/jon_chu_on_editing_with_apples_vision_pro/

And the fact that you can just use the Davinci Resolve (industry-standard post-production) for iPad app as-is in the headset is pretty fantastic for jumping in there today and being productive professionally.

GlitterInfection ,

I don't know what a movie about product placement has to do with Halloween.

GlitterInfection ,

They felt extremely small, too.

Because they are extremely tiny.

GlitterInfection ,

For the click-bait avoiders: the issue the article mentions is that some iPhones' alarms aren't going off.

This has been an issue in the past for me as well, so I hope they fix it fully.

GlitterInfection ,

Plus back before the woke liberal agenda took over the media he was always talking about "boners" which I can relate to.

GlitterInfection ,

I prefer the term "Wesley Crusher" over the term "Mary Sue" to describe that type of character.

GlitterInfection , (edited )

In the realm of toxic masculinity power fantasies there is no room for a woman who acts kind of like a normal person.

The show was written to make you root for Walt and dislike Skylar because of that, but is she really that unlikeable if you step back and look at her actions and motivations?

Edit: Sorry for being terse and using charged language in this comment.

I'm a fan of Breaking Bad. I wasn't trying to put it down or to say that people disliker Skyler because she's a woman.

Upthread I clarified things a bit, hopefully.

GlitterInfection ,

Sorry, I should have said that Skyler, the character, did nothing to deserve being disliked. The show was rigged to make you dislike her, in the sense that the storytelling was solely through Walt's eyes, even in scenes he wasn't present for.

But I didn't say that. Vince Gilligan, creator of the show, said it.

https://www.indiewire.com/features/general/breaking-bad-vince-gilligan-skyler-white-sexist-backlash-1234754425/

I also called it a "power fantasy." The show's pitch was to show a man turning himself from "Mr. Chips to Scarface." It's not a criticism, I loved the show. It took the power fantasy tropes and subverted them frequently. But at its heart that's what it is.

If you're upset that I said that it was about toxic masculinity, then I apologize. That was reductive of me. It explores hegemonic masculinity through the power fantasy trope, and it can be interpreted as either a celebration of or criticism of toxic masculinity depending on how you approach it.

Plenty of more well reasoned people than I could hope to be have written in depth on the subject. Someone even wrote a book in the subject.

If you were reacting to thinking I was putting the show down, which I wasn't intending to do, then my bad. I could have worded it better. I was trying to make the point that it's both intentional to not like Skyler, and also the obvious wrong take to not like her.

GlitterInfection , (edited )

I hear what you are saying, and while I don't fully agree that she's inherently unlikable, I understand why you're saying that you find her to be so. I mostly was asking you to question your assumptions on it, and I used some charged up language that wasn't meant as a knock at the show.

To elaborate, what I meant was that the show exaggerates her mannerisms to give Walt motivation rather than to create a fully fleshed out character. She's not a woman, but a symbol of how men have become emasculated by their wives' "wearing the pants" in the family. At least early on she's not much more than a framing device and justification for Walt's decisions.

She grows as a character, and ends up having more agency, but only in the confines of Walt's domination of their lives with his selfishly motivated, and traditionally toxic masculine, choices.

And I don't think you meant it this way, but you can't really easily separate disliking her from being a woman. I don't mean to imply that you dislike her because she's a woman, but that her character's role is to be a controlling wife. It's an inherently gendered character that relies heavily on preconceptions of what a woman should and shouldn't be in a relationship with a man who is a main character in a story.

I think it's telling that she is considered unlikable enough to even warrant discussing in a show where the main character is a multi-murderer monster who destroyed the lives of everyone he loved, and the main villains include nazis, cartels, lawyers and corporate shills.

That, for anyone, she's the most hated character on the show is enough for me to take a minute and question my assumptions on her, at least. So I thought it was worth pushing back on your comment asking you, and others reading, to do the same.

GlitterInfection ,

I used to be very picky about movies as a teenager, and tended towards more odd, surreal, films that I could find. For a long time Brazil was my favorite movie and Twin Peaks my favorite show.

I was very closed minded and my first boyfriend's sister referred to me as "the movie nazi" because I did not like Will Farrell, Adam Sandler, Tom Hanks, Sandra Bullock, and lots of other mainstream successful people.

Now I am much more open to movies of all types, and I will watch movies with actors and actresses I have pre-biased towards distaste.

My favorite movie is now Everything Everywhere All At Once, and favorite show is too many to choose from, but probably Adventure Time.

GlitterInfection ,

My joke answer is to directly tell them that they are not allowed to come on your lawn, to not let their kids do the same, and that it's your property, not a zoo.

This way you'll guarantee that your house is egged often enough that some of the eggs may not break, and some subset of those could be adopted by the ducks and hatched into baby birds that the kids also won't be able to come look at.

GlitterInfection ,

The art style looks lovely.

I was going to say that this feels like a weird franchise to adapt into a video game due to the age of its viewers but when looking up who the Smurfs are targeted at, I found this wiki page:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_Smurfs_video_games

FROM (MGM+ 2024 Series) Season 3 - Official Tease ( www.youtube.com )

FROM unravels the mystery of a nightmarish town that traps all those who enter. As the unwilling residents fight to keep a sense of normalcy and search for a way out, they must also survive the threats of the surrounding forest – including the terrifying creatures that come out when the sun goes down.

GlitterInfection ,

I hope they abandon trying to make MGM+ a thing and that this ends up on Netflix.

I loved the season I got to see before realizing it required a separate subscription to continue.

GlitterInfection ,

Not at all...

But why bother bringing up a way in which Apple DOES NOT meet requirements in your PR?

That's what I was pointing out, ffs. Not some grand argument you are putting on me.

For the record, unlike almost all the android folks who post constant hate and negativity on the apple enthusiast community, I like my Apple products and am annoyed that the EU is working to make them shittier for me so that they can applaud.

There's like 4 or 5 versions of this article posted to this community at once. People couldn't wait to rub it in the faces of the few of us who are here to be enthusiastic about Apple products.

It would be nice to have one community where I could enjoy the things I like without a flood of nonsense.

GlitterInfection ,

Yes, I understood it was a quote from the investigation and was pointing out that it is phrased in a way to make it sound like the investigation was saying "guilty even though you don't meet the criteria."

And, like all EU regulations, I am happy they think they're helping but angry at the fallout of all of their actions.

My boyfriend has a different phone model than I do, and we now have to carry multiple cables to do anything. My car has carplay over usb, so we have two cables in there, etc.

And when I update his phone we will be producing a ton of e-waste.

No I don't want you to track me with cookies, but I also don't want to go through three layers of pop ups to tell you that. Everything is shittier that the EU touches-tech-wise, and they're fisting everything hard lately.

GlitterInfection , (edited )

Thank you for the respectful responses, even though I started off with a little bit of attitude in the conversation. It has been a pleasant surprise today.

I agree that that's what they're trying to do, but I think that what we are experiencing is exactly what was obviously going to happen with the measures they put into place. So I place the blame on the EU, because they put laws in place that have made everything worse for everyone in predictable ways.

I also blame all the sites that make it hard for me to just visit them, but less so, since every individual site creator that uses cookies needs to do that, even if they are benign, and they have to deal with other regional laws such as California's weak as all hell version intending to do the same thing.

The USB-C argument is a great example of how most of these things have happened.

Apple is basically responsible for USB being the industry-wide standard to begin with. It was developed by Intel, and not widely used before Apple put it as its only option on the iMac, effectively forcing the tech into the industry.

It also provided a large portion of the engineers who developed the USB-C specification for the standards board. They effectively invented the standard alongside Intel. It was also the first to announce a laptop using the standard.

It seems like they were building the the Lightning cable at the same time in-house, possibly to hedge bets, and it was objectively better by far than what the original USB-C spec was doing at proposal time. And since USB-C wasn't adopted as a standard by the standards board yet, they chose the better product path.

By the time USB-C was formally adopted, 4 years after Apple launched its first Lightning cable-based phone, there was already tons of e-waste to contend with and it didn't have obvious benefits for the customer to make the switch, so why would they go choose that expensive, wasteful, option, that harms their users?

The same is true about the blue vs green circles. If you read the history of RCS it's like a circus show act.

It is not some open standard alternative to iMessages, like people seem to love to claim. You cannot host your own RCS server.

It doesn't support the features iMessages does, such as E2E encryption. That is a proprietary add-on from Google's chat app, not part of the "standard."

Google had to buy Jibe mobile and push hard to get this "standard" to be something serious, and it now profits off it by being basically the only one who runs the proprietary infrastructure. That purchase was 4 years after iMessages was launched.

Major telecom companies tried to band together to create their own RCS infrastructure and official app, and they bumbled the whole thing in 2019. As a result they're all centralizing on Google's Jibe platform.

All that for a product that isn't as good as what Apple put out in 2011.

I know I have biases towards the products I enjoy more, but it gets frustrating to not be allowed to enjoy them and also be on platforms like this where it's constantly twisted, revised history, in favor of much more evil companies because Apple Bad seems to be the mantra here.

An update regarding the future of m/AskKbin (where we are headed towards) - AskKbin - kbin.social ( kbin.social )

Hello everyone, check out my announcement post linked above and if you don't know who I am, check out my past post to learn more about me and It would mean a lot of you show your support for my future iniatives inside the fediverse!...

GlitterInfection ,

The link seemed to work for me from lemmy. I see three posts there when I click it at least.

GlitterInfection ,
GlitterInfection ,

"These comments remind me of the folks who thought the original iPod didn't stand a chance..."

Just going to leave this here:

https://bgr.com/general/original-iphone-reaction-comments/

GlitterInfection ,

The iPhone launched without an App store. It later went on to define the concept of having a "killer app."

It is clear from the article I linked that there were tons of people who didn't know how the iPhone fit into their lives. That's hugely revisionist history. All of the complaints about the VisionPro were made about the original iPhone. For instance:

“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance. It’s a $500 subsidized item,” said then-Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

People said it was too expensive! Here's some more:

To summarize: the iPhone is expensive and fails miserably at its primary function of making telephone calls, but other than that it's really great.

I still wouldn't buy one for everyday use.

We like our strategy. We're selling millions and million and millions of phones a year. Apple is selling zero phones. In six months they'll have the most expensive phone by far ever in the marketplace

https://www.mentalfloss.com/article/65619/13-early-criticisms-doubts-and-disses-about-iphone

I, personally, was a very late adopter to smart phones, joining when my motorola flip phone was stolen out of my hand during the iPhone 3g era. I later jumped to Android for the One Plus One, and stuck with that until jumping back to Apple devices years later.

But you could point to the Apple Watch, or the iPod, or any number of successful products that Apple has brought out and find the exact same things being said.

For example, Apple Watch will fail because:

It doesn't have a defining feature.

https://medium.com/adventures-in-consumer-technology/10-reasons-the-apple-watch-will-fail-ecfe7fdffebd

As for the VisionPro, all of the reviews I've seen for the device have been universally mixed-to-positive. They generally share your sentiment that it isn't clear yet where it fits in, but that it is an incredible, magical, device.

The most negative review I've seen has said that it's great but not worth messing up your hair to use.

But to claim it's universally panned is absolutely not true.

It's a great device that lots of people who can't afford one are complaining about. That's it so far.

GlitterInfection ,

I was late to buying an iPhone because it was a stupid, expensive, product that had no use in my life.

I was wrong.

And literally you are saying the same things that I quoted about the Apple Watch, and the same things were said about the iPad.

Not all three had the devices flying off the shelf in the first year.

But aside from that, I have a Vision Pro, and I love it.

It is better than all of the other VR headsets I have used, which is a relatively extensive list. I currently own the Index and PSVR2. And I would rather pay Apple $3000 dollars than buy a Meta product again if I can help it.

I suspect this will be more like the Apple Watch. A product people liked but didn't get at first and then over time it became the de-facto choice of smart watch.

But time will tell. I'm rooting for both the Vision Pro and the VR industry, myself, and I hope you are just like everyone I quoted you on every Apple product ever, just being foolish.

GlitterInfection ,

How is it twisting your words? Your complaints do resemble the complaints seen during every other Apple product’s release I’ve experienced. I provided some references. They are almost verbatim.

And I literally had those opinions at the time.

And comparing it to the Apple Watch is pretty damned fair. The first year sales were way lower than expected for the watch:

https://www.cultofmac.com/635432/apple-watch-first-year-sales-projections-were-outlandishly-unrealistic/

But at the end of the day, have you even tried the thing? It’s an awesome fucking product, with tons of potential. Just like virtually every review has said.

GlitterInfection ,

I know that Lemmy generally agrees with this guy's low effort, Apple Bad, opining...

But come on.

If you have strongly held opinions about a product you have never tried, maybe you can just not say them.

But I get it, you all want a space to jeer and throw tomatoes at Apple, and screw anyone who doesn't.

Also, I sent at least one of the comments in this chain from my Vision Pro, using the Voyager app while downloading 4k stereo gay porn and a 16k stereo video of a stream.

Both were awesome!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • steinbach
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • loren
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • supersentai
  • itdept
  • neondivide
  • space_engine
  • AgeRegression
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • Teensy
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • khanate
  • electropalaeography
  • MidnightClan
  • jeremy
  • fandic
  • All magazines