PapaStevesy

@PapaStevesy@midwest.social

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. View on remote instance

PapaStevesy ,

Well, Cheddar Jalapeño is the best Cheeto flavor, so I can see that being the best Cheeto mac & cheese flavor too.

PapaStevesy , (edited )

Yeah, they defined a lot of things differently then. They defined legal voters as whites only, should we rely on that definition too?

Edit: I'll assume the downvotes are yeses

PapaStevesy ,

Greenlits?! Lol, where have the editors gone

TIL scientists stepped on 175 rattlesnakes with a fake leg to see how many would bite. The study found that only 6 bit. The rest just froze or tried to wiggle away. Snakes just want to be left alone. ( www.npr.org )

https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1cwj3ca/til_scientists_stepped_on_175_rattlesnakes_with_a/...

PapaStevesy ,

A threat's a threat, I doubt snakes are aware of the fact that they even have venom, much less that it only works on certain living biological entities. But I'm no Snake Scientist, so I could obviously be totally wrong.

PapaStevesy ,

Who can never be sure?

PapaStevesy ,

I guess they don't have sieves or strainers in Canada? It's very interesting technology, I'd look into it! I recommend a chinois for starters, but if you really wanna go all out, get a tamis.

PapaStevesy ,

It's an egg that will hatch into a chicken, since the "first" chicken must have hatched out of an egg that was laid and fertilized by two "non-chickens" whose DNA combined together to make a full-blown chicken. Of course it wasn't actually just one egg, but really, no matter how you think about it, the egg came first.

PapaStevesy ,

Incorrect, a "chicken's egg" would be an egg in the possession of a chicken, which would be the egg a chicken lays. The "first chicken" did not hatch out of an egg laid by a chicken because they didn't exist.

PapaStevesy ,

No it wouldn't. If we're going to talk about the creation of chickens as happening at a single instance of egg-laying, the two progenitors of said first chicken would be proto-chickens whose DNA combined in the fertilized egg to make, for the first time ever, a chicken. Yes, it's a chicken egg, because it contains a chicken, but it's also a proto-chicken's egg because it wasn't laid by a full chicken. It couldn't have been, they didn't exist yet.

PapaStevesy ,

Yes, that's the driving force of evolution.

PapaStevesy ,

No, if a chicken could hatch out of it, regardless of whether or not it actually did, it's a chicken egg. Nothing else could hatch out of it and it didn't somehow cease to have been an egg just because it doesn't hatch.

PapaStevesy ,

We're not talking about eggs laid by chickens, we're talking about eggs laid by the things that weren't quite chickens, but the eggs of which contain chickens, due to a novel DNA combination.

PapaStevesy ,

OK, think of it like this instead. Obviously fuck accuracy, for ease we'll call them cavepeople. Two different cavepeople that are genetically distinct from humans have sex, resulting in a genetically human fetus. That doesn't suddenly change the cavepeople into humans, they're still genetically different. It's a caveperson's fetus, but it's a human fetus. Same thing with the egg. Genetically, the thing inside is a chicken and, genetically, the things that made the egg are not.

PapaStevesy ,

Yeah, we were necessarily ignoring the obvious evolutionary issues inherent in the chicken-and-egg scenario, since it very clearly was not one egg-laying instance that created a new species. I know I made reference to as much somewhere in the thread, it seemed like a waste of time to restate it every comment. I'm fairly certain we were on the same page about that. Cool wall though!

PapaStevesy ,

I just don't get why you're so hung up on the potentiality of an unhatched egg when that has nothing to do with the scenario. The egg in the scenario hatches and it has a chicken in it. That's the whole point of the scenario.

PapaStevesy ,

Exactly, it doesn't belong to the offspring, that's why I said it is a proto-chicken's egg. It belongs to the ones that made it and raised it. But we know the contents because it's a preset hypothetical in which the egg hatches and it has a chicken in it. So it's a chicken egg that belongs to proto-chickens.

PapaStevesy ,

I don't know much about computers except for the one at my house my mom put some games on there I play em sometimes—

PapaStevesy ,

They're called people with dwarfism, in this case it looks like proportionate dwarfism. "Little people" is a generally accepted term in the community, but it's best not to assume with things like that, so just call them a person. It's actually a very woke carving.

PapaStevesy ,

I was being sarcastic, I don't know what it's supposed to be and neither does anyone in here, lol

PapaStevesy ,

That's bad taxonomy, because then what's a taco salad? It's an untossed taco salad salad. But we still don't know what taco means. So it's becomes an untossed untossed taco salad salad salad. Which becomes an untossed untossed untossed taco salad salad salad salad. We never learn what a taco actually is.

PapaStevesy ,

Exactly! I had to look it up, but yes, it is.

PapaStevesy ,

"Pray and, if it's something god already wanted to happen, god will grant your prayers!"

PapaStevesy ,

You can have black ancestry and appear not-black, so this really doesn't support her argument at all.

PapaStevesy ,

Psst! Race is also a societal construct!

PapaStevesy ,

Does it matter?

The real answer is it depends on what box they check when they fill out forms. Presuming they don't check the "choose not to answer" box. Then there's simply no way of knowing.

PapaStevesy ,

I agree! She could be big-boned and 17 for all I know. I certainly don't care. Also, no way she's the first, the others just couldn't talk about it because of people like you.

PapaStevesy ,

Watch the video above, deviling would be quite easy actually.

PapaStevesy ,

Nah, remembering all the names is way harder. Not to mention distinguishing the individual bees...

PapaStevesy ,

Idk about that, I miss my niche podcast subreddits, it's just one big quote-fest.

PapaStevesy ,

Yeah, definitely not what I would call a niche podcast. I mean, I guess it is niche, but I also guess that when I said "niche" before, I really meant "small listenership". Then people are pretty much just always cool!

PapaStevesy ,

Yeah, we need the classic Drake meme with "She's a 10” on top and "She is 10” on bottom.

PapaStevesy ,

Needs a punchline. That last panel is completely pointless and wastes a good setup imo.

PapaStevesy ,

Except the last panel isn't poignant either. Like I said, it's useless. It would be just as poignant without it, and if they had actually written a punchline, it could have been funny too.

PapaStevesy ,

I think that's a very generous read, and I just don't see it. The first three panels are well done, but the last adds nothing. It's like someone ending a Little Johnny joke with "and then the teacher sent him to the principal's office" instead of with whatever dirty thing Johnny said that was supposed to be the actual punchline.

PapaStevesy ,

"Don't worry, I think he's gonna pull it!"

PapaStevesy ,

Lol, I never suggested anything about the author’s writing process and I certainly never even implied that I thought you were a dumbass, which I don't. But now I'm not convinced you're not the actual cartoonist, since you seem to have intimate knowledge of their creation process and their recreational habits. It's not a "character study"—you would need characters for that—it's a setup with no punchline, it's half a joke. Actually, it's worse, it's a joke with a decent punchline, followed by a whole extra panel that just restates what the reader already learned in the previous panel with the actual punchline, making me feel like the author thinks I'm a dumbass.

PapaStevesy ,

But it doesn't make it better for anyone, and it does make it worse for the rest of us, so...

PapaStevesy ,

Sorry I didn't read and respond to that wall of text, lol. All I'll say is, If you need 6 paragraphs to explain why it's a good joke, it's not a good joke.

PapaStevesy ,

But I'm not a dumbass right? Thank god

PapaStevesy ,

Wow, y'all cannot handle a little trolling huh. Are incels really taking this whole thing seriously? Just remember guys, it is personal, hahaha

PapaStevesy ,

Well yeah, it's an impossible hypothetical, it's not supposed to have a point. Actually, it did have a point, which it very easily accomplished: trigger incels. Just remember, there would be no reactionary media without media consumers being reactionary.

PapaStevesy ,

Would be even better if you replaced her headband in the last frame with Geordi's visor.

PapaStevesy ,

I mean, if they didn't, they would have fought harder to get Obama's nominee through.

PapaStevesy ,

"What do you fear?" is not very specific, is there another question the title is supposed to be referring to?

PapaStevesy ,

Just so you know, this comment reads like you really like Jeffrey Epstein and you think he was set up...

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • steinbach
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • loren
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • supersentai
  • itdept
  • neondivide
  • space_engine
  • AgeRegression
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • Teensy
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • khanate
  • electropalaeography
  • MidnightClan
  • jeremy
  • fandic
  • All magazines