TechDesk , to Random stuff
@TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

The FCC has voted to restore net neutrality rules, which were previously rescinded under former president Donald Trump.

The vote reinstates protections established in 2015 that treat broadband as a utility, like water or electricity, and means all internet traffic must be treated equally. Here's more on what it means for you, from @CNN

https://flip.it/rRm7kj

rbreich , to Random stuff
@rbreich@masto.ai avatar

So far this week...

The FTC banned the use of noncompete clauses.

The DOL strengthened overtime rules.

The FCC restored .

The DOT expanded protections for airline passengers.

This is what it looks like when the government works on behalf of the people.

debanqued , (edited ) to Technology in Net neutrality is back as FCC votes to regulate internet providers

It’s worth noting that the FCC’s so-called “Open” Internet Advisory Committee () tragically gives two seats on the board to:

  • Cloudflare
  • Comcast

Both of whom are abusers of , especially Cloudflare. A well-informed Trump-free administration should be showing Cloudflare and Comcast the door ASAP.

Sure, Trump would just bring them back. But it’d at least be a good symbolic move.

Indeed, as someone else pointed out, the needed change should come from pro-netneutrality legislation. And the legislation needs to be broad enough to block Cloudflare’s broad discriminatory arbitrary attack on access equality, not just tinker with speeds at the ISP consumer level.

w7voa , to Random stuff
@w7voa@journa.host avatar

FCC restores net neutrality.

TCatInReality ,
@TCatInReality@mastodon.social avatar

@w7voa
Hurray!!

Delighted to see the return of

KimPerales , to Random stuff
@KimPerales@toad.social avatar

Net Neutrality is restored:

"In a 3–2 vote, the FCC voted to restore Net Neutrality protections & reclassify high-speed-internet access services as telecom services subject to Title II of the Communications Act.

The decision is a major victory for the public interest: Title II authority empowers the FCC to hold companies: AT&T, Comcast, Spectrum... accountable for a wide range of harms to internet users across the US, fast, open +fair for all of us.”


https://www.freepress.net/news/press-releases/historic-fcc-vote-restore-net-neutrality-title-ii

br00t4c , to Random stuff
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

Belgium blocks Tor users from accessing legal statutes on privacy protection law ( web.archive.org )

The linked page is accessible to everyone because a US-based NGO has mirrored Belgian law and made it accessible to all people. But attempts to directly visit www.ejustice.just.fgov.be is blocked if you are on the Tor network. The packets are silently dropped making it look as if the website is offline; so the Tor community is...

petersuber , to Random stuff
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Later this month (April 25) the will vote on restoring .
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-401616A1.pdf

Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel backs it: "A return to the FCC’s overwhelmingly popular and court-approved standard of net neutrality will allow the agency to serve once again as a strong consumer advocate of an open internet.”

mikarv , to Random stuff
@mikarv@someone.elses.computer avatar

if your mobile provider tries to stop you tethering (including when roaming) using your allowance, it's worth trying (on mac):

sudo sysctl net.inet.ip.ttl=65
sudo sysctl net.inet6.ip6.hlim=65

this adds +1 to the time to live of your computer's packets and fools simple detectors which try to block tethering on the basis that it is one extra hop from computer to phone before going to the telco.

vanschewick , to Random stuff
@vanschewick@mastodon.lawprofs.org avatar

The FCC wants to restore for all Americans.

That's great & important.

But the proposal misses some critical 2015 net neutrality protections, creating potential loopholes for ISPs to exploit.

Here's how to close them: https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2024/03/how-strengthen-fccs-proposed-net-neutrality-protections-closing-loopholes-and-matching

nixCraft , to Random stuff
@nixCraft@mastodon.social avatar

Microsoft is blocking Firefox login with FIDO2 key on office dot com https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1824831

kkarhan ,
@kkarhan@mstdn.social avatar

@nixCraft How is this not a violation of ?

I hope @bsi will ask about this of @mozilla .

pluralistic , to Random stuff
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Reality has a distinct anti-conservative bias, but conservatives have an answer: when the facts don't support your policies, just get different facts. Who needs when you can have ?

--

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/10/digital-redlining/#stop-confusing-the-issue-with-relevant-facts

1/

ALT
  • Reply
  • Expand (24)
  • Collapse (24)
  • Loading...
  • 18+ pluralistic OP ,
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    Think of , the idea that if you pay an ISP for internet service, they should make a best effort to deliver the data you request, rather than deliberately slowing down your connection in the hopes that you'll seek out data from the company's preferred partners, who've paid a bribe for "premium delivery."

    This shouldn't even be up for debate.

    7/

    Free software in education will take a step back -- republicans are going after school board positions nationwide in the US ( web.archive.org )

    Since last year, republicans have launched a campaign to get conservatives on school boards. This is the political party in the US who favors privatization of everything. They are sympathetic to giant corporations and champion #citizensUnited (which elevates corporations above humans). #Ohio has a large number of extremists...

    debanqued OP , (edited ) to Free and Open Source Software in Free software in education will take a step back -- republicans are going after school board positions nationwide in the US

    is Tor-hostile. I do not support excluding people so I shared a link that is open to the public and inclusive.

    If AP News would have also blocked archive.org (thus public libraries) then I would not have shared the link at all — out of respect for (access equality).

    pluralistic , to Random stuff
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    The thing is, any feed or search result is "algorithmic." "Just show me the things posted by people I follow in reverse-chronological order" is an algorithm. "Just show me products that have this SKU" is an algorithm. "Alphabetical sort" is an algorithm. "Random sort" is an algorithm.

    --

    If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/03/subprime-attention-rent-crisis/#euthanize-rentiers

    1/

    18+ pluralistic OP ,
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    I've proposed something similar, applicable across multiple kinds of digital businesses: an principle for online services. The end-to-end principle is as old as the internet, and it decrees that the role of an intermediary should be to deliver data from willing senders to willing receivers as quickly and reliably as possible. When we apply this principle to your ISP, we call it .

    61/

    herhandsmyhands , to Random stuff
    @herhandsmyhands@romancelandia.club avatar

    FCC to restore and also, hey, to protect our online activity from scrapping--be it for training without our consent, or for even more nefarious purposes.

    When the public comment period opens, for your own interest, comment--the vultures will, by the thousands, using bots/AI, so we need to show up and make sure our voices are heard, and our interests protected.

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/10/fcc-moves-ahead-with-title-ii-net-neutrality-rules-in-3-2-party-line-vote/

    ALT
  • Reply
  • Expand (17)
  • Collapse (17)
  • Loading...
  • evangreer , to Random stuff
    @evangreer@mastodon.online avatar

    Next time you see someone drinking the "nothing bad has happened since the repeal of " kool aid, make them read this https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-10-12/fcc-seeks-to-restore-network-neutrality-rules-trump-era-deregulation

    robpegoraro , to Random stuff
    @robpegoraro@journa.host avatar

    It is correct to note that when the repeal of freed ISPs to slow sites or shake them down for paid-prioritization deals, they did no such thing. (To put it another way, their ambitions to turn broadband into a two-sided market proved to be a fraud.) But if you don't even talk about privacy now that the FCC plans to restore those rules, I can't take your objections seriously. https://www.lightreading.com/regulatory-politics/at-mwc-fcc-s-carr-denounces-net-neutrality-revival-as-a-dead-end

    TechDesk , to Random stuff
    @TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

    Net neutrality may be popping up in your tech headlines and social media timelines. ZDNet explains exactly what it is, why the Federal Communications Commission wants to restore it and what it might mean for internet broadband prices.

    https://flip.it/dVMDOd

    robpegoraro , to Random stuff
    @robpegoraro@journa.host avatar

    The 2015 case for Title II rules centered on Internet providers abusing their chokepoint powers to shake down sites, services and apps. The 2023 case for those regulations is much more focused on data privacy--maybe because Congress has spent the last eight years not doing anything useful to defend it. https://www.pcmag.com/news/fcc-prepares-to-take-another-swing-at-writing-net-neutrality-rules

    Wander , to Random stuff
    @Wander@packmates.org avatar

    In the wake of and controversy, I would like to highlight the existance of the approach.

    Remember , ISPs being common carriers and them not meddling with the pages users want to see? This is similar.

    Under a "remote neutral" approach each instance leaves the tight opinionated moderation policies to their own users users and the content their users generate or share with the aim of running a safe and welcoming instance for their members that's safe to federate with.

    However, remote content is only moderated whenever there is a report and only blocked if it's straight out illegal to host / cache or constitute unsolicited spam/harassment. Otherwise objectionable remote content is limited at most and users can block it if they want.

    I can't stress enough the benefits this has:

    1. It makes moderation feasible for small instances

    2. It does not fracture the fediverse unnecessarily

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • jeremy
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • loren
  • steinbach
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • electropalaeography
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • itdept
  • AgeRegression
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • khanate
  • space_engine
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • Teensy
  • MidnightClan
  • supersentai
  • neondivide
  • fandic
  • All magazines