Democrats ask America's most corrupt Supreme Court justice, Clarence Thomas, if he would be kind enough, pretty please, to explain more about his corruption...
He is, of course, not explaining anything -- and daring anyone to do something about it.
@rbreich I try to avoid products with weird weight/volume measurements, like 11 3/8 oz, as they clearly represent cheating by presenting a package that appears to be of a standard size but is actually smaller. Coffee if particularly bad. I don't mind the occasional one that looks funny till you see that it is a reasonable 'round number' in metric. Trader Joes' "pound plus" chocolate bars are actually 500 grams.
@mattblaze So, you have been willing to pay the premium to get flashlights without the attached guns? Next will you say you have a TV set that does not connect to the internet?
Well this has been a long time coming: The FCC today levied fines totaling nearly $200 million against the four major carriers -- including AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon -- for illegally sharing access to customers' location information without consent.
Some highlights: "The FCC's findings against AT&T, for example, show that AT&T sold customer location data directly or indirectly to at least 88 third-party entities. The FCC found Verizon sold access to customer location data (indirectly or directly) to 67 third-party entities. Location data for Sprint customers found its way to 86 third-party entities, and to 75 third-parties in the case of T-Mobile customers."
..."The fine amounts vary because they were calculated based in part on each day that the carriers continued sharing customer location data after being notified that doing so was illegal (the agency also considered the number of active third-party location data sharing agreements). The FCC notes that AT&T and Verizon took more than 320 days from the publication of the Times story to wind down their data sharing agreements; T-Mobile took 275 days; Sprint kept sharing customer location data for 386 days."
I can't believe I even have to say this, but it is not normal that the Supreme Court is taking its sweet time to decide if the president can incite an insurrection to overturn an election and maintain power. This should have been decided already. The answer is no!
The estate tax rate should be 100% after -- let's be wildly generous to heirs who've never lifted a finger to earn their parents' money -- the first , say, $10 million.
But not outraged enough to become activists on behalf of the democracy -- under escalating Republican attack -- that provides the underpinning for freedom of the press.
@dangillmor As long as the Oligarchy control the media and as long as publishing requires money, reporters continually choose between feeding their families and the ethics of their profession.
If I seem pissed off that Meta is unfairly blocking my site on their entire network and deleting any posts that linked to my site in the last 20 fucking years and dishonestly telling people their links were deleted because I’m spreading malware, it’s because I FUCKING AM PISSED OFF
@Green_Footballs Unless you have copies of all your posts, you have fallen into the trap of expecting others, whose interests are NOT yours, to guard your work. This is painfully true when you did not pay for the facilities you used. Disk drives are cheap. Always maintain full copies of anything you care about on YOUR OWN property.
I'm not likely to stop using Mastodon, but I'm seriously considering limiting it to photos and professional announcements. Posting personal stuff, opinions, and engaging in general discussion has become extremely unrewarding for me here.
Today I've been scolded on Mastodon by different strangers for:
Failing to apologize for, or justify my use of, Twitter/X (I don't actually use Twitter/X).
Lacking sufficient propriety in expressing my refusal to justify my use of Twitter/X, which I don't use.
Posting insufficiently interesting things because I was too busy exceeding the bounds of propriety when I refused to justify my use of Twitter/X, which I don't use.
I think people need to adjust their expectations of my feed.
What's demoralizing is that almost no other top editors in the business are willing to say this so plainly -- to make clear that their organizations will refuse to give any ink, much less equal ink, to the relentless liars who are poisoning our public discourse.
This has virtually zero chance of happening. There is no way it would get 2/3 support in both chambers of Congress, never mind 3/4 of state legislatures.
Here's the update I just added to yesterday's story. Thanks to @GossiTheDog for the alias tip:
Apple seems requires a phone number to be on file for your account, but after you’ve set up the account it doesn’t have to be a mobile phone number. KrebsOnSecurity’s testing shows Apple will accept a VOIP number (like Google Voice). So, changing your account phone number to a VOIP number that isn’t widely known would be one mitigation here.
Also, it appears Apple’s password reset system will accept and respect email aliases. Adding a “+” character after the username portion of your email address — followed by a notation specific to the site you’re signing up at — lets you create an infinite number of unique email addresses tied to the same account.
For instance, if I were signing up at example.com, I might give my email address as krebsonsecurity+example@gmail.com. Then, I simply go back to my inbox and create a corresponding folder called “Example,” along with a new filter that sends any email addressed to that alias to the Example folder. In this case, however, perhaps a less obvious alias than “+apple” would be advisable.
@briankrebs@GossiTheDog Some entities will test/check the number and reject it as not being a true mobile number (it happened to me yesterday when I tried to use a Google Voice number - not for Apple but for something else).
Asshole actor is aggrieved because -- he claims -- an airline said "Find another way to get where you're going" after he objected to sitting next to someone who was wearing a mask.
Had dinner with a group of highly accomplished people in a field I know little about who mostly talked shop. That sounds like poor etiquette, but I love listening to experts talk shop, especially when they tolerate my occasional dumb questions.
There’s something odd about Trump’s inability to post an appeal bond in his NY civil fraud case. All those buildings and clubs could serve as collateral against a loan to pay the bond…unless they are already pledged as collateral on other loans. Is it all a house of cards?
San Francisco voters passed a law that will turn the city into a surveillance capital, and removed most accountability for abuses by police and others in government.
As Josh Marshall observes, re the Russian op against the Bidens:
"The story here is how the U.S. again got bamboozled by transparent foreign manipulation and how the U.S. political press bought into it pretty much whole hog."
Our political press isn't terrible solely because it cares more about horse races than one party's attacks on democracy. It's dangerous, in its willful incompetence. We're in some trouble, and there's no sign that most journalists care -- at all.
Various media services are confused about this. Some are reporting 70,000 people out -- it's actually apparently the entire nationwide network, but that number of people have apparently complained officially so far on support forums I'm told. There are some reports that other mobile carriers are out, these are not true -- ONLY AT&T is out.
911 continues to tell people to use LANDLINES!
Dear California CPUC, do you understand now the risks that AT&T is trying to force down our throats by ending landlines?
@mattblaze And I was all set for a free ride. Pshaw. [PS Too bad the the Mastodonians have refused to allow quoting of a toot, so the replies have no meaning or context.]
In the spirit of Christmas, yesterday I didn't block a couple of Mastodon scolds who don't approve of the way I use this site. Instead, I waited until today to block them.
Clarence Thomas’ Private Complaints About #Money Sparked Fears He Would Resign
Interviews and newly unearthed documents reveal that #ClarenceThomas, facing financial strain, privately pushed for a higher salary and to allow #SupremeCourt justices to take speaking fees.