kuketzblog , to Privacy German
@kuketzblog@social.tchncs.de avatar

Du hast einen Mobilfunkvertrag bei der Deutschen Telekom, Vodafone, Congstar, Fraenk oder O2? Dann solltest du die umstrittene utiq-Plattform (Werbetracking) deaktivieren. 👇

https://www.kuketz-blog.de/datenschutz-utiq-tracking-in-drei-schritten-deaktivieren-verhindern/

image/png
image/png
image/png

73CC ,
@73CC@social.tchncs.de avatar

@kuketzblog @wetell Wie siehts diesbezĂŒglich bei euch aus? Bisher zufriedener Kunde 🙂

YaDev ,
@YaDev@social.tchncs.de avatar

@kuketzblog
Ich denke, dass dieses Deaktivieren, das Sammeln von Daten nicht verhindert. FĂŒr mich sieht es nur danach aus, dass die Seite, die bei utiq anfragt, eben nur ein flag bekommt, dass der User keine personalisierte Werbung wĂŒnscht. Utiq wird aber weiterhin diese Anfragen zu einem Datensatz zusammenfassen.
Am Ende bekommt man eben statt personalisierter Werbung irgendeine Werbung angezeigt und utiq sammelt weiterhin die Daten, die dann nach nem Jahr aktiv werden wer nicht wiederspricht.

kuketzblog , (edited ) to Privacy German
@kuketzblog@social.tchncs.de avatar

An alle: Deutsche Telekom, Orange, TelefĂłnica und Vodafone Mobilfunknutzer: Widerspruch bei der Online-Werbeplattform Utiq einlegen - fĂŒr ein Jahr gĂŒltig. 👇

https://consenthub.utiq.com/

claudius ,
@claudius@darmstadt.social avatar

@kuketzblog "fĂŒr ein Jahr gĂŒltig"? könnte sich das der @bfdi mal ansehen? Das ist doch ziemlich sicher nicht DSGVO/BSDG-Konform?

hpro ,

@kuketzblog wetell nutzt das Netz von Vodafone. Greift dann der UtiqTracker nicht doch?

ilumium , to Privacy
@ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

Holy shit, I thought I knew how evil the industry was but here we are:

Two-thirds of European websites just ignore your choice and track you anyways, researchers from found. đŸ€Ż

https://www.usenix.org/system/files/sec23winter-prepub-107-bouhoula.pdf

blakespot , to Privacy
@blakespot@oldbytes.space avatar

I thought the cookie consent alerts were bad back in the states, but - WOW. If I lived here (visiting Europe), I would FAR rather have cookies just set and not be told about it vs. this level of in-your-face, at-every-turn COOKIE ALERT, without question. Oy.

jowek ,
@jowek@autonomous.zone avatar

@HauntedOwlbear @cyrus @blakespot It might haven gotten better, but i never got Consent-o-matic to work in my browser...
Having succes with add-on Ghostery for firefox.

HauntedOwlbear ,
@HauntedOwlbear@eldritch.cafe avatar

@jowek
Consent-o-Matic does the trick for Firefox 123.0.1 (64-bit) for me (on Pop!_OS Linux), but I'm aware that "it works on my system" means little in the grand scheme of things. :D

@cyrus @blakespot

reginagrogan , to Privacy
@reginagrogan@mastodon.social avatar

Not all need notifications on, especially:

  1. Entertainment apps
  2. Social media apps

You control your devices, your devices do not control you.

Side eye @ and where you need notifs to find the vehicle however they fill it on off days with spam

Tutanota , (edited ) to Privacy
@Tutanota@mastodon.social avatar

Meta thinks your is for sale.

Would you pay 160 euros per year to Facebook & Instagram for respecting your right to privacy?

Here's more info: https://tuta.com/blog/meta-pay-for-privacy-illegal

arthunter ,

@Tutanota
Absolutely not. That would be like paying protection money.

powerofthenegative ,
@powerofthenegative@mastodonapp.uk avatar

@Tutanota
I think I have put a lot of social media in the box marked infrequent use.

ilumium , to Random stuff
@ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

Here is what the could enable if no checks and data collection limits are put in place:

--> "Private UK health data donated for medical research shared with insurance companies"
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/nov/12/private-uk-health-data-donated-medical-research-shared-insurance-companies

Because of:

  • Unclear legal bases for processing sensitive records
  • A data maximisation policy in the law
  • Ambiguous data categories and definitions
  • No requirement or right for patients

kuketzblog , to Random stuff German
@kuketzblog@social.tchncs.de avatar

Consent-Banner der @ZDF Website. In mehrerer Hinsicht einfach kaputt. Machen wir doch ein kleines Quiz. Was stimmt hier nicht?

image/png
image/png

GerhardD ,
@GerhardD@olching.social avatar

@ZDF @kuketzblog Hmmm.. „erforderliche 
“ ist ein opt-out?

momi ,
@momi@mastodontech.de avatar

@kuketzblog @ZDF Die Schalter mĂŒssen in unterschiedlichen Farben dargestellt werden, um beide besser voneinander zu unterscheiden. Bei gleichen Farben könnte man versehentlich auf “Zustimmen" klicken!

Em0nM4stodon , to Privacy
@Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange avatar

Never forget that in privacy consent is key. And consent must be free and informed to be valid consent.

Coercion is not consent.

Absence of choice is not consent.

Ignorance of available choices is not consent either.

Tutanota , (edited ) to Privacy
@Tutanota@mastodon.social avatar

Meta thinks your is for sale.

Would you pay 160 euros per year to Facebook for respecting your right to privacy?

Comment below! 👇

aral , to Random stuff
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

If the thing you’re making wouldn’t exist if people had to opt in instead of having to opt out, maybe the thing you’re making shouldn’t exist.

motoridersd , to Random stuff
@motoridersd@pug.ninja avatar

A note on

Being on a friendly or instance does not grant consent.

Wearing , , or any related item does not grant consent.

Unless specifically allowed in a user's profile, or in a conversation, don't reply with sexually charged comments. Doing so is like touching a stranger in public, and that is not ok without express approval.

Please remember to be respectful when interacting with others on any platform

Consent is sexy!

crecente , to EduTooters group
@crecente@games.ngo avatar

"Not only that, [sex ed] can actually be fun — an idea that would shock most US school boards and cause all the Karens to start freaking out."

🌐 https://dutchreview.com/expat/education/sex-education-in-the-netherlands/

@edutooters

crecente , to publichealth group
@crecente@games.ngo avatar

@theconversationau

🧐 "Our findings show how current messages to simply avoid do not work for young people."

😍 Thank you for this article. Too many people do not want to accept the reality of this admittedly complex situation. Instead, they continue applying the same (so-called) solutions.

Instead:
â–Ș acknowlege reality
â–Ș teach & healthy relationships (BONUS: that's what they would rather learn)
â–Ș stop criminalizing & shaming those you're trying to help

🌐 https://theconversation.com/we-teach-school-kids-about-safe-sex-we-need-to-teach-safe-sexting-too-224748

@edutooters @publichealth
@sociology
@psychology

soatok , to Random stuff

Thanks to Samantha Cole at 404 Media, we are now aware that Automattic plans to sell user data from Tumblr and WordPress.com (which is the host for my blog) for “AI” products.

In response to journalists probing this shady decision from Automattic leadership, the company said nothing but published a statement.

This statement, which was presumably filtered through more lawyers than their CEO’s recent Twitter rambling against trans users (or Automattic employees’ statement about his conduct for that matter), betrays a critical misunderstanding of what consent is.

We are also working directly with select AI companies as long as their plans align with what our community cares about: attribution, opt-outs, and control.

Emphasis mine

This is not the tech industry’s most egregious lack of understanding of consent in recent years. That dishonor belongs to LegalFling: A blockchain app for sexual consent.

However, this is still pretty stupid, and the result of an insidious trend that doesn’t get questioned enough in software engineering circles. So I’m asking that my readers shout this from the fucking rooftops.

Opt-Out Is NOT Consent

Opt-out is “our lawyers told us to make this an option to cover our ass, but we don’t want you to actually do it”.

Opt-out is “if you missed the memo, we assume we have your consent”.

The default state of any decision regarding user data should be opted out. Users should instead be required to opt in for your decision to take effect, and they must not be coerced into doing so.

If consent is not explicitly given by an informed user, you haven’t received consent at all, and to pretend otherwise is unethical.

Your users don’t fucking care about opt-out. We care about opt-in.

“But Soatok, That’ll Hurt Our Revenue”

If you have to make money doing unethical things, or by following dubious practices that don’t actually respect other users’ autonomy, then you should go out of business.

End of.

What Automattic Should Do

If Automattic wants to make things right, they must do two things and could do a third thing (but I’m not holding my breath):

First, nuke the existing opt-out mechanism and replace it with an opt-in mechanism. If nobody checks it, then don’t include their data in the sale to Midjourney or OpenAI.

Second, they should make the permission for third-parties more granular. Some of us don’t care about third parties, but do NOT want “AI” companies using their data to enable plagiarism.

Third, if you want to go the extra mile, add support for a plugin that uses Nightshade on all hosted media in all WordPress.com plans, including free plans, to increase your users’ protection against LLM scrapists.

This is my open challenge to Automattic leadership to do better.

This Issue is Bigger than Automattic

The tech industry has gotten very bad at respecting users’ consent lately. Your options are no longer “Yes” and “No” anymore. Instead it’s “Yes” or “Maybe Later”, without a “Never” option.

ugh not even @signalapp is safe from the unstoppable deprecation of consent in favour of “not now” pic.twitter.com/sW4Ss2pqMb

— @delan + cohost.org/delan (@dazabani) October 6, 2020

This entire goddamn thread.> the unstoppable deprecation of consent in favour of “not now”, episode 3 https://t.co/ooaDcHVhMh

— @delan + cohost.org/delan (@dazabani) May 12, 2021

It does keep going. I’m going to skip a few, but check it out.> the unstoppable deprecation of consent in favour of “not now”, episode 18 pic.twitter.com/CRdfujOBZt

— @delan + cohost.org/delan (@dazabani) September 3, 2023

Yes, even Linux is affected.Even worse, you can rarely uninstall the crapware that nags you with these consent dialogs.

This needs to stop. It’s a toxic mentality and it cultivates a culture that doesn’t respect humanity. (Which is kind of funny to write as a furry blogger.)

If you work in the tech industry, scream very loudly about properly implementing human-respecting consent controls into your software.

Just because it’s widespread doesn’t mean it’s inevitable. Push back against it. Your less privileged, less technical neighbors deserve better.

https://soatok.blog/2024/02/27/the-tech-industry-doesnt-understand-consent/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • ‱
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • steinbach
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • loren
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • supersentai
  • itdept
  • neondivide
  • space_engine
  • AgeRegression
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • Teensy
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • khanate
  • electropalaeography
  • MidnightClan
  • jeremy
  • fandic
  • All magazines