@ligniform "Exceptional content curated by the Firefox family". This really is thought-provoking: I've hardly ever seen a more giant red flag, even more so when contrasting it to the actual content. This is sponsored content and should be clearly declared as such. And the money gained from it should go to the devs, not the c-suite.
@youronlyone Pointless to base your browser on an engine that gets worse web compatibility. With Chromium, you get to free-ride off of Google and Microsoft.
Yo - #Firefox adding PDF edit capability is pretty sweet. How did that not make a bigger splash when 124 came out? SO many people end up at sketchy sites or worse trying to save a PDF form or edit a PDF document. This is such a big deal!
The current version of #Mozilla#Firefox is 125.0.2 #Librewolf is still stuck at version 124.0.1 & #MullBrowser from #FDroid is at 124.2.
Not sure, why both of them are not getting any further updates? Have they already given up? Time to switch back to vanilla #Firefox?
Giving @librewolf a try. I like the idea of a browser specifically hardened against browser fingerprinting and tracking. Runs all of my existing Firefox plugins with no problems
@filmfreak75@actuallyautistic@MrBerard@actuallyadhd When I’m working with a multiple monitor setup, the left screen has the dock on the left side vertical, the laptop screen in the middle on a platform has dock on the bottom horizontal, set to auto-hide, and the right screen has the dock on the right side vertical.
@bhawthorne@actuallyautistic@MrBerard@actuallyadhd there’s been a slow and steady progression building up the last few months so this was inevitable — fortunately the meeting it happened during was with the more reasonable people at work
@frogzone Yes, we can see this post. Can you reach out to frontdesk@torproject.org with a description of the problem, so we can look into the specifics? Thank you!
Not sure what if anything I am doing wrong, but I wanted to try setting up a personal DNS over HTTPS server ( #DOH ) that was password protected, but I can't make it work.
DOH without authentication works fine, but once I have the server require a username and password #firefox and chrome won't pass a username to the DOH server.
@xdydx I can't remember where I started. I first created a DOH server many years ago using NGINX. However as I was replacing that system recently I wanted to ditch the NGINX part and do it all with ISC BIND, which can do DOH natively now.
But when I was trying to make things more secure and locked down I found the issues I mentioned.
@xdydx I tried using NGINX to for authentication, which works, but I could not get any web browser to actually use it.
I want to use DOH to my own DNS server on a laptop wherever in the world I may be. That means it needs to be open to the world, but I'd rather not have the world have access to an otherwise internal DNS server.
If the browser stored the credentials, authenticated DOH would happen without me noticing anything.
I could obfuscate it a bit, but decided to just give up for now.
Also, some interesting @thunderbird trivia: In 2004, internet access wasn't nearly as widespread as it is now, so Mozilla offered to send installation CD-ROMs to users for $5.95.