ICalzada , to China
@ICalzada@mastodon.social avatar
openrightsgroup , to Privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Power to the… government and corporations? 🤔

The removes controls over our data, exposing us to State surveillance and commercial exploitation.

⌛ Contact your MP before the Bill returns to the UK Parliament on 29 November!

➡️ https://action.openrightsgroup.org/email-your-mp-stop-data-grab-bill

ALT
  • Reply
  • Loading...
  • + xdydx
    pluralistic , (edited ) to Random stuff
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    My latest column is "Don't Be Evil," a consideration of the forces that led to the Great Enshittening, the dizzying, rapid transformation of formerly useful services went from indispensable to unusable to actively harmful:

    https://locusmag.com/2023/11/commentary-by-cory-doctorow-dont-be-evil/

    --

    If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/22/who-wins-the-argument/#corporations-are-people-my-friend

    1/

    18+ pluralistic OP ,
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    When Google contemplates adding anti-adblock to its web viewers, the dissent might say, "Processing users' data in order to ad-block them will violate Europe's ."

    14/

    pluralistic , to Random stuff
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    How could this happen? Owners of automatic garage door openers just woke up to discover that the company had confiscated valuable features overnight, and that there was nothing they could do about it.

    --

    If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/11/09/lead-me-not-into-temptation/#chamberlain

    1/

    18+ pluralistic OP ,
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    Competition, regulation, constraint and self-help measures all backstop one another, and while one or a few can make a difference, they are most powerful when they're all mobilized in concert. Think of the failure of the 's landmark privacy law, the . While the GDPR proved very effective against bottom-feeding smaller ad-tech companies, the worse offenders, and , have thumbed their noses at it.

    45/

    ciferecaNinjo OP , (edited ) to No Stupid Questions in Do any ATMs in Belgium support balance inquiries?

    Banks are gradually removing features from their websites in a progression toward complete elimination of the website. Some banks have already taken that step. They impose an app whilst also closing their over-the-counter service.

    Unlike the US, 1-factor authentication by banks is illegal in Belgium. So for web access banks typically hand out devices for 2FA. Some banks avoid that cost by imposing a smartphone app in lieu of a card reader or RSA token (BYO smartphone).

    There are many problems with bank apps in Belgium:

    1. You must buy smartphone hardware (the apps detect when they are executed inside a virtual machine & deny service [tested with Ing’s app])
    2. You must patronize a surveillance capitalist (create a Google or Apple account)
      2.1. You must subscribe to mobile phone service in order to satisfy Google’s unreasonable demand for a mobile phone number as a precondition to obtaining an account
      2.2. You must trust Google with your mobile phone number, IMEI number, and inventory of apps & versions you download (thus a reconnaissance risk)
      2.3. When Google records your place of banking, you must trust Google not to share that info (with debt collectors, for example)
    3. All bank apps in Belgium are closed-source, so you must trust the apps not to carry spyware and to work in your interests
      3.1. The bank’s privacy policies are written to allow your realtime location to be tracked via the app.
    4. You must chronically upgrade your hardware every few years because the bank apps are upgraded with reckless disregard to the lockstep-coupling of hardware to software on all phone platforms that are supported by Belgian banks. You cannot run a VM to prevent irresponsible electronic waste (see point 1)

    The possibly (and only symbolically¹) protects from some of that, such as Google sharing your place of banking with debt collectors. But the GDPR does not prevent criminal exfiltration of data that cavalier consumers trustingly agree to the collection of.

    Footnotes:

    1. I say “symbolically” because consumers only have two pathways for remedy under the GDPR: article 77 & direct lawsuit. Article 77 has no teeth. When the DPA ignores/mothballs an art.77 complaint, there is no mechanism for action against the DPA. So DPAs are largely neglecting to treat art.77 reports. That leaves direct lawsuits. The EU has decided that GDPR plaintiffs are not entitled to compensation for legal fees. So that kills that option. You can get a symbolic win in court but you still lose because lawsuits are costly and the damages you can prove are negligable. So the GDPR boils down to an honor system.
    bendrath , to Random stuff German
    @bendrath@eupolicy.social avatar

    A German court has just declared a "Do Not Track" signal from your browser as legally binding, pursuant to Article 21(5) . https://www.vzbv.de/urteile/gericht-untersagt-datenschutzverstoesse-von-linkedin

    pluralistic , to Random stuff
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    Think of everything that makes you miserable as being caught between two opposing, irresistible, irrefutable truths:

    • "Anything that can't go on forever eventually stops" ()

    • "Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent" (Keynes)

    --

    If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/10/30/markets-remaining-irrational/#steins-law

    1/

    18+ pluralistic OP ,
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    This can't last forever, but how long until Zuck's reality distortion field runs out of battery? That's the $46.5B question.

    The market can certainly remain irrational for a hell of a long time. But the market isn't the only force that regulates corporate outcomes. Regulators also regulate. Europe's is now seven years old, and it plainly outlaws Facebook's surveillance.

    For nearly a decade, Facebook has pretended that this wasn't true, and they got away with it.

    34/

    ljrk , to Random stuff
    @ljrk@todon.eu avatar

    Yesterday I we talked about and compliance and it's just worth a shoutout to @gamingonlinux for their stellar approach:

    • Pictures are embedded as-is
    • YouTube is embedded but with behind a button to activate that feature - Thunderbird is a sponsor which is just a static image with a link that's not distracting at all

    And there's no banner. Because there's no need.

    Liam, you rock! <3

    emmanuelwald , to Privacy French
    @emmanuelwald@deacon.social avatar

    I see some shady things with cookie banners, but it's the first time I see a banner which silently links to google.com when one clicks on "reject".

    bfaliszek , to Random stuff Polish
    @bfaliszek@mastodon.online avatar

    Blokowanie dostępu do YT dla osób mających Ad-Blocka jest w EU nielegalne, bo nie wyraziły one zgody na dostęp do swoich danych(info o zainstalowanych rozszerzeniach w przeglądarce). Google musi poprosić o możliwość sprawdzenia czy mamy ad-blocka i możemy odmówić. Wszystko dzięki https://eupolicy.social/@thatprivacyguy/111261130799704016

    Skyper , to Privacy
    @Skyper@fosstodon.org avatar

    I'm consternated to see that most American companies, even privacy-focused ones like @purism and Private Internet Access (PIA VPN), don't bother answering GDPR requests...

    And another round of legal actions... 😩

    noybeu , to Random stuff
    @noybeu@mastodon.social avatar

    👉Your Chance to work with the @noybeu Team as a ! 😊

    We are looking for young lawyers that want to gain experience in litigation and enforcement.

    ⏩Find out more & apply now https://noyb.eu/en/traineeship

    Tutanota , (edited ) to Privacy
    @Tutanota@mastodon.social avatar

    Meta thinks your is for sale.

    Would you pay 160 euros per year to Facebook for respecting your right to privacy?

    Comment below! 👇

    gerry , to Random stuff
    @gerry@mastodon.pirateparty.be avatar

    My GDPR request to the Belgian gov was refused because the ID card copy that was included with the request was not printed in color. Can anyone confirm whether that’s a legit requirement? Color prints are like €1/page these days, which would add up and make all my GDPR requests a bit costly.

    ilumium , to Random stuff
    @ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

    As long as keep on regurgitating this bullshit about "highly relevant ads" we will never be free of .

    (Screenshot from newsletter)

    ALT
  • Reply
  • Loading...
  • openrightsgroup , to Random stuff
    @openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

    “Facebook has already shifted users’ agreements for UK users away from the EU to its US terms, does not allow UK users to opt-out of personalised advertisements, nor do they plan to switch to a consent-based model of advertising like is happening in Europe.

    It's more than obvious that Facebook doesn't believe the Information Commissioner's Office will enforce UK data protection standards."

    🗣️ @marianods for ORG

    https://theferret.scot/uk-privacy-watchdog-threads-app-probe/

    jo3rg , to Random stuff
    @jo3rg@infosec.exchange avatar

    23 years of illegal data transfers due to inactive DPAs and new EU-US deals.

    The highest European court sent a strong message for better data privacy, when it invalidated the data transfer deals "Safe Harbor" and "Privacy Shield" in 2015 and 2020 respectively.

    The logical consequence of this decision was that almost all transfers between the European Union and United States since the year 2000 were illegal.

    In reality, companies didn’t stop the practice though. This was largely made possible by to the inaction of European data protection authorities (DPAs), which mostly failed to implement the CJEU’s rulings. In combination with new (and void) deals, we are therefore lookig back on 23 years of illegal data transfers.

    More: https://noyb.eu/en/23-years-illegal-data-transfers-due-inactive-dpas-and-new-eu-us-deals

    themarkup , to Random stuff
    @themarkup@mastodon.themarkup.org avatar

    The legality of web scraping in the European Union depends heavily on the kind of the data you want to collect.

    We explain when you can move ahead with a project—and when you should contact a lawyer. https://themarkup.org/levelup/2023/08/23/how-to-legally-scrape-eu-data-for-investigations

    TechDesk , to Random stuff
    @TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

    Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft and Google are the heavyweights when it comes to global cloud services, owning 65 percent of the market. Smaller European providers are looking to build their own systems to not only compete with Big Tech, but to also protect the data of European consumers from less strict U.S. laws.

    https://flip.it/taEcyr

    weirdwriter , to Random stuff

    So, I'm moving to a self hosted version of @classicpress soon, thanks to @viktor offering managed hosting! Fully managed! We're working out some transfering hickups right now but I'll get to do so much more with this new website that I wasn't able to before because of the .com version of actually making things inaccessible. So, privacy questions.

    I don't want to collect anything. I don't even want my site to collect data, but I do want to enable comments. Is this possible? I've been looking into but I don't understand all of it. Like, I honestly don't want your cookies, I don't even want your email to go into my system. Now for the questions.

    Can anyone point me to a privacy policy generator?

    If I use the plugin, can people leave comments on my blog from multiple services/things?

    If I actually have people emailing me replies instead of commenting openly on the website, am I still in violation of GDPR?

    profcarroll , to Random stuff
    @profcarroll@federate.social avatar

    Old enough to remember when Sheryl Sandberg promised that all global users would enjoy the benefits of the ’s protection but in the end, after vigorously resisting even the most basic compliance, only EU residents will get a clear YES or NO choice on invasive ad targeting. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/08/meta-finally-caved-to-eu-demands-to-get-consent-for-personalized-ads/

    darnell , to Random stuff
    @darnell@one.darnell.one avatar

    The flagship instance is experiencing growing pains, but is also discouraging residents in (or rather the 🇪🇺) from signing up due to issues.

    👉🏾 https://darnell.day/misskey-io-20-000-new-users-daily-discourages-europeans-from-signing-up-over

    Too long; Did Not Read:

    👉🏾 Misskey (https://misskey.io) signing up 20,000 new users per day
    👉🏾 After consulting lawyers, Misskey.io will now discourage Europeans from signing up
    👉🏾 could fill in the vacuum in Europe

    DolphinSeeker , to Random stuff
    @DolphinSeeker@mstdn.social avatar

    So just asked me if I wanted to create a post with some photos I had downloaded onto my phone. It was album artwork I had uploaded to use with some music tracks, they weren't even in my main DCIM album, but evidently, good ol' has scoured my entire phone looking for pictures. That's not creepy at all! And people are falling over each other to join SMH :blobcatglance:

    czottmann , to Random stuff
    @czottmann@norden.social avatar

    A potential customer asked for my app’s privacy policy, when I pointed them to https://obsidian.actions.work/privacy they replied with “thanks, but I’m not going to read 9000 words”, so I added a TL;DR section to the top — 4 sentences of plain language. HTH!

    (Deutsche Version: https://obsidian.actions.work/datenschutz)

    18+ maugendre , to Random stuff
    @maugendre@hachyderm.io avatar

    In 2020, the EU-level judiciary decreed whereby customers of US cloud service providers must themselves verify the data protection laws of the recipient country, document its risk assessment and confer with its customers.
    In 2021, various French-state-level authorities stated that did not conform (to doctrine and ) or that secondary education schools should avoid it. 👇

    maugendre OP ,
    @maugendre@hachyderm.io avatar

    Storing data in "the Cloud" legally constitutes data processing.

    : "Synchronisation with the Microsoft server" transfers your data to Microsoft.

    The German Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information, Ulrich Kelber, described the data collection as "alarming" and announced his intention to pursue at European level: https://social.bund.de/@bfdi/111381793883035665

    @dataGovernance @data

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • loren
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • supersentai
  • itdept
  • neondivide
  • AgeRegression
  • Teensy
  • jeremy
  • MidnightClan
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • electropalaeography
  • steinbach
  • space_engine
  • khanate
  • fandic
  • All magazines