kbal avatar

kbal

@kbal@fedia.io
kbal ,
kbal avatar

Not really, though. His main purpose is to keep both the carbon tax and his own name in the headlines, so I guess he succeeded.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

As the comment there says, the surprise is that not every instance is blocked yet.

But I've seen hardly any Chinese on the fediverse, so they probably don't care that much. And it's not just that I've stuck to the English-speaking parts, there's been lots of Japanese and various European languages. I suppose even if it otherwise would have a chance to catch on there, Chinese users know that if it did it quickly would get blocked.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

I'm sure lots of people do, it's a big country. But for the vast majority I imagine that the risk of getting in trouble for it, plus the risk of the one you paid for getting successfully blocked, plus the difficulty of finding out which ones are allowed to operate only because they share all your data with the authorities, plus the cost, plus the usual difficulties in finding a good vpn outweigh any desire to communicate freely with foreigners.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Yes, that's a perfectly good explanation for why they need to block wikipedia, deviantart, archiveofourown, github, bandcamp, lemmy.ml, and mastodon.social: they're all just fronts in the Capitalist Information War

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Vladimir Putin's landslide reelection

He gets so much good press about it around the world, I wonder why he doesn't have himself elected more often. Once a year perhaps, on Vladimir Putin day.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

It took me a moment to find out what I'd seen Steve Pemberton in that made him look familiar: Most recently, he played one of the nazi agents from hell in Good Omens.

But also: League of Gentlemen! I had recently been trying and failing to remember the name of that show. All I do remember is that it was pretty damn weird at times.

dangillmor , to Random stuff
@dangillmor@mastodon.social avatar

Accounts that start replies with "In fact," when the original post was accurate, are great candidates for muting or blocking.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

In fact you could probably just block everything containing the word "fact" and it'd still be a somewhat workable heuristic.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

companies could show their annoying banners only to the EU residents.

It's starts out badly by assuming that web servers are able to tell which country their visitors reside in.

The "do not track" header is not turned on by default in most web browsers. If it not being present were legally safe to take as granting permission to track everything, many of the big web publishers would've gladly done so. Making it mandatory to respect the DNT header would have required a different law than the one we got. But it probably still wouldn't have been the best option.

The right answer to getting rid of tracking cookies is the 3rd-party data isolation pioneered by Firefox, combined with fingerprint-resistant browsers that clear all but whitelisted cookies on tab close or browser exit.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

That conclusion depends on two things: That the "do not track" header would suffice instead, which I think it doesn't as things stand; or that all builders of web sites would do better not to make any attempt to (for example) keep track of which of their visitors have been there before, which is not going to happen for reasons that are obvious. If those obvious reasons are found to be inadequate, they should at least be addressed to make the point convincingly.

Otherwise one might as well go ahead and say that most of what exists on the web today is not needed at all, which is also technically true. It's strange to see it suggested that it's wrong to think law makers "should have known" that something like what happened would be the result. It was inevitable from the start, and as I recall much talked-about. The sites that have cookie banners are all trying to sell you something, and the sales department is not going to willingly give up the best tools it's had since the 1990s when the cost is just looking slightly more sleazy to first-time visitors.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

The article seems to confirm what's been my understanding which is that that pretty much anything beyond "session cookies" or the like is covered, whether or not the data collected gets sold or transferred to anyone else.

But yes, there are reasons why data gets sold to advertisers as well. Commercial incentives which are strong and predictable. Regulations should not be designed as if they aren't there.

kbal , (edited )
kbal avatar

Nope, I'm not one of them. But I have worked for large companies in the past and therefore have met them.

The GDPR has done substantial good, not least in just getting people to talk about this sort of thing. But the cookie banners are and always have been ridiculous and a sign of one of its failures. An outright ban on surveillance capitalism business models would suit me better.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Talking about piracy on lemmy is still not illegal, in most places.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

The vast majority of those (on the dbzer0 list) are obviously just copied from someone's medium-sized mastodon blocklist, which in this case mostly includes instances that definitely deserve it. I recognize only a few dubious choices in there, and none that are completely indefensible.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

The current fediseer censured list seems much larger and correspondingly more problematic in places. You've started out with a good list, hope you exercise due caution in adding to it.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Yeah, sorry, I've never really looked at it before. But its web UI just shows them all as one big list. I wouldn't mind seeing a list of those censured by more than 10 instances, or all of a selected group of instances... is that in the API?

thegreybeardofthetree , (edited ) to Firefox
@thegreybeardofthetree@fosstodon.org avatar

tagging @mozilla @mozilla @firefox @firefox to see if this post shows up on .

Apparently your mastodon posts show up on Lemmy under the right circumstances (tagging a Lemmy community). 🤞

Edit: if I remove the tagging, will the post magically disappear from Lemmy too?

Edit:
For mastodon users wondering about this, here's the corresponding Lemmy thread: https://lemmy.ml/post/13358920

Mastodon thread for Lemmy users: https://fosstodon.org/@thegreybeardofthetree/112120405122806398

Ref: https://social.vivaldi.net/@bittin/112118062570031583

kbal ,
kbal avatar

hello from mbin, which in my mind is sort of half lemmy-like and half mastodon-like.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

That website seems to have multiple fediverse accounts devoted to spamming links to it all over the place, without making it clear in their profiles that they're working on its behalf.

ethauvin , to Linux
@ethauvin@mastodon.social avatar

The Linux kernel scheduler has been accidentally hardcoded to a maximum of 8 cores for the past 15 years and nobody noticed

https://thehftguy.com/2023/11/14/the-linux-kernel-has-been-accidentally-hardcoded-to-a-maximum-of-8-cores-for-nearly-20-years/?utm_medium=erik.in&utm_source=mastodon

kbal ,
kbal avatar

tl;dr it's the min_granularity scheduler parameter, and others related to granularity, which were limited to a setting appropriate for 8 cores.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Yeah it's otherwise a fine article, I just think its version of the tl;dr was lacking what people who already know what a scheduler is and so forth would want to know.

Assuming that the bug is as described it'll be interesting to see what results when people start doing some testing of what effect it's had.

lowqualityfacts , to Random stuff
@lowqualityfacts@mstdn.social avatar

All of them. Every single one.
https://patreon.com/lowqualityfacts

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Birds aren't too smart and many of them arrive a little too early for winter such as in April, or sometimes too late like in March.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Teaching the beavers to use a microwave oven was of less benefit to the regional ecology than had been hoped for.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

While I agree that hexbear generally sucks, they and I do at least have an enemy in common. That ban is not so undeserved as I was led to expect.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Tankies say all kinds of stupid things, but even if we grant the thus-far unproven assumption that the person being addressed there is among them, when they're telling nazis to fuck off that is not an appropriate moment to try and start a pointless fight by asserting that they're wrong about every single thing.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

The actual smim textures don't have any .esp/esl and therefore aren't covered by loot, so you probably need to check/adjust that some other way.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Right, but did you check the non-plugin load order? How to do it depends which mod manager you're using I guess, or if like me you're not using one then which order you install them in. (I couldn't get mo2 running on linux back when I started.)

SMIM should go early. You can see that it's not on the list you posted here.

kbal , to Go - Weiqi - Baduk
kbal avatar

Well, I finally found out how to subscribe to c/baduk from here. Any baduk players still hanging around?

kbal OP ,
kbal avatar

It's not "bad uk" if perchance that's what you're thinking. It's the game of Go, also known as igo, baduk, or weiqi.

kbal OP ,
kbal avatar

Or if it's the c/ part you don't recognize, that's a lemmy thing.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

So what's their excuse for season 1?

Isn't religion really just an opinion?

So, recently I was talking to a friend and somehow we got to talking about religion and stuff. When I complained that religion is often put on a huge pedestal and that it's really just a glorified opinion and should be subject to the same criticism as any other opinion, they told me that that was a really hot take....

kbal ,
kbal avatar

The average religion is a huge tangled mess of opinions, beliefs, customs, traditions, and practices. If you think it is adequately summed up as being "an opinion" then you know less than nothing about religion. Which, since you are an atheist, is fine. Nobody says you need to understand religion. Just be careful not to underestimate by too much how much you don't know about it.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

The idea that opinion and the most solid faith of religious certainty are the same kind of thing is not necessarily unreasonable, although it's unusually blunt as systems for classifying different kinds of belief go.

But not all religion is about faith, or about believing the right things. The one I'm guessing you're probably most familiar with puts an unusual degree of emphasis on it, but even so there is a lot more to it.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Come to think of it, treating all beliefs within a religion — all the most obscure statements of its holy books and the most maniacal speeches of its ordained preachers — as if they're equivalent to the central principles of the faith, is also the sort of thing the craziest of the religious zealots do. There are always plenty of opinions in a religion for which it can be useful for adherents and atheists alike to recognize a difference in their character compared to that of the core tenets.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Specialised crew members capable of providing medical care have been a feature of military vessels for at least two thousand years. — wikipedia

kbal ,
kbal avatar

yeah, I just think it suggests the sort of tv shows you might look for.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

I dunno if it was a trend but I'm told that Doc Walton was pretty well-known.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

with each meal Gila grows more

biblical beast of ancient lore

kbal ,
kbal avatar

It prominently features a quote from Gavin Schmidt. Readers who prefer to get a more scientific view of the story can see his thoughts on the topic directly at realclimate.org.

AkaSci , (edited ) to Random stuff
@AkaSci@fosstodon.org avatar

Woke AI? Killing people? Scaremongering much?
Why are good people still supporting X by tweeting there?
1/n

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Apparently it's not easy to give up a social media addiction, even when your supplier starts mixing increasing amounts of rat shit into the product.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Ever since I misheard someone as saying that "fashion is going out of fashion" I keep waiting for it to happen.

kbal , (edited )
kbal avatar

I don't really have a preference myself, but Richard Stallman's continued insistence that "per" is the right answer is the example that comes to mind.

As he puts it, "most languages have genderless singular third-person pronouns which are distinct from the plural pronouns. English deserves to have them too."

Perhaps in a hundred years, once the old way of making the distinction is long forgotten, a new one will arise.

kbal , (edited )
kbal avatar

Not all of the complaints are motivated just by deliberate obstinance. I'm old enough that it was genuinely confusing for me at first in some situations, but young enough that I got used to it after some years. There are still plenty of people out there who haven't done enough conversing with those who habitually default to "they" to get used to it. Not all of them are as old and cranky as Mr. Stallman.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Of course it is not that it's somehow a "stand in for he or she" inherently in current usage. It's just that it has recently replaced those other pronouns in places where for some time they had held near-universal prevalence among most users of this language.

Just as some people who've never known the old ways think those people who still aren't accustomed to it are putting on an act when they say it's weird and confusing, I suppose it would be easy for those who've lived through the change to mistakenly assume that young people are being disingenuous when they act as if there's been no change for hundreds of years and there's nothing to remark on here. If you're old enough to have seen it happen, the change in usage seems very obvious. If not, perhaps it isn't.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Using "he" as the default singular 3rd-person pronoun goes back centuries, not decades. It was sexist to varying degrees, but never all that close to truly gender-neutral since modern English itself goes back only so far as times that have been pretty close to maximally sexist. But you can see it plainly in the King James Version of the Bible for example. You won't find any singular "they" there in the sort of places where its use today is novel. There are of course plenty of places where its use is not novel at all.

The late 20th-century innovation was to write out "he or she" in the many places where it seemed necessary, because we didn't have any single word that would fit. Using "they" to refer to "someone", "anyone", or other referents like that was perfectly normal as it has always been. The examples you provide are most naturally thought of in that way and would not spook the old people today. Using "they" to refer to "a student" or some other specified but unnamed individual would on the other hand often seem wrong to people just 30 years ago, but one might sometimes get away with it depending on the audience and the grammatical circumstances. Using "they" to refer to "Jason" or other such specifically known and named people in general was not done, never had been done except perhaps by the occasional poet from centuries past, and everyone would just wonder who you were talking about even if they'd been named earlier in the same sentence. Calling Jason a "she" would also seem odd, but not nearly as odd as calling them a "they"; and if what I've read is at all representative then roughly similar logic would've usually applied in centuries going back to fairly near the start of modern English.

As may still come in handy on occasion, that short-lived move towards using the hideously awkward phrase "he or she" gave many of us plenty of practice in simply avoiding all phrases that call for a gender-neutral 3rd-person pronoun. Whatever else might be said about it, being able to use "they" is certainly an improvement over that situation.

kbal ,
kbal avatar

Ah well, sorry about that; I felt I didn't express myself well in that last one but I stand by the part where I don't think we disagree on anything too substantial basically. Thanks for the reply, see you around.

dangillmor , to Random stuff
@dangillmor@mastodon.social avatar

Sure, TikTok is terrible in many ways. But the hypocrisy of its critics, especially members of Congress, is almost beyond belief.

The problem with TikTok is the same one we have with countless other Internet products: They are relentless violators of our privacy and security.

Fix that, and you've fixed TikTok.

Democrats are just as bad as Republicans on this. And so is Big Journalism, which mostly just amplifies the lies.

This is a moral panic with a mercantile edge.

(From a year ago...)

kbal ,
kbal avatar

It seems more like saying that banning imports of Japanese lawnmowers is not a sensible way to put an end to fossil fuels.

Request for errors on fedia.io

Hi all. I was recently made aware that people have been getting error 429's and other error 500's when visiting fedia.io. My hope/expectation is that those will no longer happen now that I've moved back to a bare metal install, but if you do experience that, please comment below, or if that doesn't work, send me an emai to...

kbal ,
kbal avatar

In case it's not obvious that it's gone wrong just now, it's started giving me 500 and 502 errors. ... and now it's stopped.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • Mordhau
  • WatchParties
  • Rutgers
  • jeremy
  • Lexington
  • cragsand
  • mead
  • RetroGamingNetwork
  • AgeRegression
  • loren
  • xyz
  • PowerRangers
  • AnarchoCapitalism
  • kamenrider
  • electropalaeography
  • WarhammerFantasy
  • itdept
  • Teensy
  • mauerstrassenwetten
  • steinbach
  • khanate
  • learnviet
  • bjj
  • MidnightClan
  • space_engine
  • supersentai
  • neondivide
  • fandic
  • All magazines